The influence of anesthesia on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgeries

被引:6
|
作者
Benuska, J. [1 ]
Plisova, M. [1 ]
Zabka, M. [1 ]
Horvath, J. [1 ]
Tisovsky, P. [1 ]
Novorolsky, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ruzinovska 6, SK-82606 Bratislava, Slovakia
来源
BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY | 2019年 / 120卷 / 10期
关键词
neuromonitoring; MEP; motor evoked potential; spinal deformity; anesthesia; propofol; sufentanil; ketamine; amplitude; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CORTEX STIMULATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; ISOFLURANE; SCOLIOSIS; INCREASES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2019_133
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring using tc-MEPs satisfactorily detects motor tract integrity changes during spinal surgery. However, tc-MEP is affected by anesthesia and other factors, in which the stimulation threshold increases because the waveform amplitude decreases over time with the accumulation and boluses of anesthetics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 139 patients. The average age was 30 years. Tc-MEPs were recorded bilaterally from the tibialis anterior muscle and the abductor hallucis muscle. Statistical tests were used to investigate the changes to evaluate anesthetic effects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tc-MEP amplitude change (%) between the groups of propofol (13 %), remifentanil (22 %) and sufentanil (26 %, p < 0.01). Significant differences were found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (20 %) and bolus sufentanil (-30 %), and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.008). Major differences were observed between bolus sufentanil (-30 %) and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.001). When comparing tc-MEPs with no amplitude, no significant difference was found between the groups of propofol (26 %), remifentanil (24 %), and sufentanil (28 %, p < 0.007). Substantial difference was found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (mean 26 %) and the group where ketamine boluses were administered. We didn't observe any loss of amplitude (0 %, p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: IONM may be useless in patients where boluses of sufentanil are administered and also with Medical Research Council grades 3 and below. Consider applying IONM in patients with severe spinal deformity along with a higher age of over 50 and neurological deficit. Increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of tc-MEP. Our concept of findings supports the neurophysiological monitoring findings in other studies (Tab. 10, Ref. 45).
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal deformity surgery
    Jea, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2014, 13 (03) : 245 - 246
  • [32] Protocol for intraoperative neurophysiological spinal cord monitoring
    Franco-Carcedo, C
    Villalibre, I
    González-Hidalgo, M
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 1999, 28 (06) : 583 - 587
  • [33] Protection of the remaining spinal cord function with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during paraparetic scoliosis surgery: a case report
    Chen, Zhengyong
    Lerman, Joel
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2012, 26 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [34] Use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgical treatment of spinal diseases
    Karan, Vedrana
    Dilvesi, Dula
    Karan, Mladen
    Papic, Vladimir
    Vulekovic, Petar
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2019, 147 (7-8) : 502 - 505
  • [35] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Scoliosis Surgery in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy
    Li, Bin
    Deng, Yaolong
    Sui, Wenyuan
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Liu, Fuyun
    Hu, Weiming
    Yang, Junlin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 197
  • [36] Effect of anesthesia on motor responses evoked by spinal neural prostheses during intraoperative procedures
    Toossi, Amirali
    Everaert, Dirk G.
    Uwiera, Richard R. E.
    Hu, David S.
    Robinson, Kevin
    Gragasin, Ferrante S.
    Mushahwar, Vivian K.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (03)
  • [37] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord stimulator implantation
    Goel, Vasudha
    Kaizer, Alexander M.
    Jain, Sejal
    Darrow, David
    Shankar, Hariharan
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (03) : 192 - 199
  • [38] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord:: Our experience
    Perez-Orribo, L.
    Perez-Lorensu, P. J.
    Roldan-Delgado, H.
    Garcia-Conde, M.
    Spreafico, M.
    Garcia-Marin, V.
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2008, 47 (05) : 236 - 241
  • [39] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Surgical Correction of Scoliosis for Postoperative Recovery of the Patient's Motor Function
    Arestova, Yu S.
    Sayfutdinov, M. S.
    Savin, D. M.
    Nasyrov, M. Z.
    Ryabykh, T., V
    Ryabykh, S. O.
    SOVREMENNYE TEHNOLOGII V MEDICINE, 2021, 13 (05) : 55 - 60
  • [40] Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring between propofol and remimazolam during total intravenous anesthesia in the cervical spine surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Myoung Hwa
    Park, Jinyoung
    Park, Yoon Ghil
    Cho, Yong Eun
    Kim, Dawoon
    Lee, Dong Jun
    Kwak, Kyu Wan
    Lee, Jongyun
    Han, Dong Woo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 78 (01) : 16 - 29