The influence of anesthesia on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgeries

被引:6
|
作者
Benuska, J. [1 ]
Plisova, M. [1 ]
Zabka, M. [1 ]
Horvath, J. [1 ]
Tisovsky, P. [1 ]
Novorolsky, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Ruzinovska 6, SK-82606 Bratislava, Slovakia
来源
BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY | 2019年 / 120卷 / 10期
关键词
neuromonitoring; MEP; motor evoked potential; spinal deformity; anesthesia; propofol; sufentanil; ketamine; amplitude; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRIC MOTOR; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CORTEX STIMULATION; PROPOFOL; KETAMINE; ISOFLURANE; SCOLIOSIS; INCREASES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.4149/BLL_2019_133
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring using tc-MEPs satisfactorily detects motor tract integrity changes during spinal surgery. However, tc-MEP is affected by anesthesia and other factors, in which the stimulation threshold increases because the waveform amplitude decreases over time with the accumulation and boluses of anesthetics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 139 patients. The average age was 30 years. Tc-MEPs were recorded bilaterally from the tibialis anterior muscle and the abductor hallucis muscle. Statistical tests were used to investigate the changes to evaluate anesthetic effects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tc-MEP amplitude change (%) between the groups of propofol (13 %), remifentanil (22 %) and sufentanil (26 %, p < 0.01). Significant differences were found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (20 %) and bolus sufentanil (-30 %), and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.008). Major differences were observed between bolus sufentanil (-30 %) and bolus ketamine (730 %, p < 0.001). When comparing tc-MEPs with no amplitude, no significant difference was found between the groups of propofol (26 %), remifentanil (24 %), and sufentanil (28 %, p < 0.007). Substantial difference was found between the groups of propofol, remifentanil, and sufentanil (mean 26 %) and the group where ketamine boluses were administered. We didn't observe any loss of amplitude (0 %, p < 0.0002). CONCLUSION: IONM may be useless in patients where boluses of sufentanil are administered and also with Medical Research Council grades 3 and below. Consider applying IONM in patients with severe spinal deformity along with a higher age of over 50 and neurological deficit. Increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of tc-MEP. Our concept of findings supports the neurophysiological monitoring findings in other studies (Tab. 10, Ref. 45).
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery
    Jong-Hwa Park
    Seung-Jae Hyun
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2015, (09) : 765 - 773
  • [22] Analysis of Multimodal Intraoperative Monitoring During Intramedullary Spinal Ependymoma Surgery
    Park, Jong-Hyeok
    Lee, Sun-Ho
    Kim, Eun-Sang
    Eoh, Whan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 120 : E169 - E180
  • [23] Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spinal Cord Surgery
    Taskiran, Emine
    Brandmeier, Sema
    Ozek, Erdinc
    Saris, Ramazan
    Bolukbasi, Fatihhan
    Elmaci, Ilhan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 27 (03) : 436 - 440
  • [24] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring team's communique with anesthesia professionals
    Tewari, Anurag
    Francis, Lisa
    Samy, Ravi N.
    Kurth, Dean C.
    Castle, Joshua
    Frye, Tiffany
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (01) : 84 - 93
  • [25] Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Tod B. Sloan
    Paul Mongan
    Clark Lyda
    Antoun Koht
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2014, 28 : 139 - 147
  • [26] An evaluation of anesthetic fade in motor evoked potential monitoring in spinal deformity surgeries
    Ugawa, Ryo
    Takigawa, Tomoyuki
    Shimomiya, Hiroko
    Ohnishi, Takuma
    Kurokawa, Yuri
    Oda, Yoshiaki
    Shiozaki, Yasuyuki
    Misawa, Haruo
    Tanaka, Masato
    Ozaki, Toshifumi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [27] A Preliminary Study of Volatile Agents or Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Neurophysiological Monitoring During Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Martin, David P.
    Bhalla, Tarun
    Thung, Arlyne
    Rice, Julie
    Beebe, Allan
    Samora, Walter
    Klamar, Jan
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (22) : E1318 - E1324
  • [28] Crossover Phenomena in Motor Evoked Potentials During Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring of Cranial Surgeries
    Gonzalez, Andres A.
    Akopian, Vahe
    Lagoa, Iria
    Shilian, Parastou
    Parikh, Pooja
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (03) : 236 - 241
  • [29] Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord
    Sloan, TB
    Heyer, EJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) : 430 - 443
  • [30] Carotid Endarterectomy Surgeries: A Multimodality Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Approach
    Jahangiri, Faisal R.
    Liang, Marie
    Huckabey, Misty
    Baloney, Naomi
    Sharifi, Sarah
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)