Virility does not imply immensity: Testis size, accessory gland size and ejaculate depletion pattern do not evolve in response to experimental manipulation of sex ratio in Drosophila melanogaster

被引:10
作者
Chechi, Tejinder Singh [1 ]
Syed, Zeeshan Ali [1 ]
Prasad, Nagaraj Guru [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res, Sect 81, Mohali 140306, Punjab, India
关键词
Sperm competition; Sexual selection; Reproductive investment; Ejaculates investment; Testes size; Accessory glands; Drosophila melanogaster; SPERM COMPETITION GAMES; BODY-SIZE; REPRODUCTIVE-BEHAVIOR; RISK; EVOLUTION; INCREASE; FITNESS; NUMBER; MALES; BUTTERFLIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.11.012
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Sperm competition theory predicts that with increase in sperm competition, males either invest more in reproductive organ(s) and/or improve ejaculate investment. We test this idea using experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. We maintained replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster under male (M) and female (F) biased sex ratio regimes for more than a hundred generations with the result that males from the M regime evolved higher sperm competitive abilities relative to males from the F regime. In the present study, we measured the testes and the accessory gland size of virgin and singly mated males from the M and F regimes. The M and F males do not differ in either testis or accessory gland size. Additionally, ejaculate investment is not different in the M and F males, as measured by reduction in testis and accessory gland sizes. Thus, contrary to theoretical prediction and evidence from other species, we found that evolved differences in sperm competitive ability are not necessarily due to evolution of testis/accessory gland size or strategic ejaculate investment in these populations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [31] Morrow EH, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P2608
  • [32] Nandy B, 2011, J INSECT SCI, V11, DOI 10.1673/031.011.6701
  • [33] Evolution of mate-harm, longevity and behaviour in male fruit flies subjected to different levels of interlocus conflict
    Nandy, Bodhisatta
    Gupta, Vanika
    Sen, Sharmi
    Udaykumar, Niveda
    Samant, Manas Arun
    Ali, Syed Zeeshan
    Prasad, Nagaraj Guru
    [J]. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [34] SPERM COMPETITIVE ABILITY EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL ALTERATION OF OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO
    Nandy, Bodhisatta
    Chakraborty, Pratip
    Gupta, Vanika
    Ali, Syed Zeeshan
    Prasad, Nagaraj Guru
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2013, 67 (07) : 2133 - 2141
  • [35] Parker G.A., 1998, Sperm competition and sexual selection, V3, P54, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTB.2005.1785
  • [36] Sperm competition games: Individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners
    Parker, GA
    Ball, MA
    Stockley, P
    Gage, MJG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1375) : 1291 - 1297
  • [37] SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN INSECTS
    PARKER, GA
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1970, 45 (04) : 525 - +
  • [38] SPERM COMPETITION GAMES: A GENERAL MODEL FOR PRECOPULATORY MALE-MALE COMPETITION
    Parker, Geoff A.
    Lessells, Catherine M.
    Simmons, Leigh W.
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2013, 67 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [39] Sperm competition and ejaculate economics
    Parker, Geoff A.
    Pizzari, Tommaso
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2010, 85 (04) : 897 - 934
  • [40] An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution
    Prasad, N. G.
    Bedhomme, S.
    Day, T.
    Chippindale, A. K.
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 169 (01) : 29 - 37