Improving the efficiency of genetic algorithms for frame designs

被引:12
作者
Chen, SY [1 ]
Rajan, SD [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
roof truss; genetic algorithm; optimal design; AISI; frame design; structural optimization;
D O I
10.1080/03052159808941248
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The focus of this paper is on the development of a design software system that has enough flexibility and capability to search for the most economical steel roof truss design in a reasonable amount of time. This objective is achieved by improving the efficiency and robustness of the genetic algorithm (GA) methodology developed earlier. The effects of schema representation, schema survival, type of crossover, problem definition, the size of the population, and the number of design iterations on the computational expense and the value of the objective function are studied. The research results show that while the final AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) code-conforming 'best' designs are very close to each other when different starting designs (ground structures) are used, the use of some GA strategies can lead to either highly non-optimal designs or design processes that are computationally expensive. The results also show some other interesting conclusions. The size of the population and the maximum number of design iterations (or generations) need to be at least the size of the chromosome. The schema representation is perhaps one of the most important factors. Depending on the complexity of the initial design (density of the ground structure) and the size of the chromosome, a newly developed Association String strategy has led to a computationally effective GA process when combined with the elitist, one-point and uniform crossover strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 307
页数:27
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] *AM I STEEL CONSTR, 1986, LOAD RES FACT DES SP
  • [2] BUDIMAN J, 1993, P 34 AIAA ASCE ASME, P544
  • [3] CROSSLEY WA, 1995, THESI ARIZONA STATE
  • [4] Eshelman L.J., 1991, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, P115
  • [5] Goldberg D., 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHMS S
  • [6] GOLDBERG DE, 1986, P 9 C EL COMP, P471
  • [7] OPTIMAL SIZING, GEOMETRICAL AND TOPOLOGICAL DESIGN USING A GENETIC ALGORITHM
    GRIERSON, DE
    PAK, WH
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1993, 6 (03): : 151 - 159
  • [8] AISI LRFD METHOD FOR COLD-FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
    HSIAO, LE
    YU, WW
    GALAMBOS, TV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1990, 116 (02): : 500 - 517
  • [9] TOWARDS STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION VIA THE GENETIC ALGORITHM
    JENKINS, WM
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1991, 40 (05) : 1321 - 1327
  • [10] LIN CY, 1993, P 34 AIAA ASME ASCE, P2437