Development of an inpatient operational pharmacy productivity model

被引:10
作者
Naseman, Ryan W. [1 ,2 ]
Lopez, Ben R. [1 ,2 ]
Forrey, Ryan A. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Robert J. [3 ,4 ]
Kipp, Kris M. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, James Canc Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[3] OSU Wexner Med Ctr, Serv Pharm, Columbus, OH USA
[4] OSU Coll Pharm, Columbus, OH USA
[5] OSU James Canc Hosp, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY; MONITORING TOOLS; WORKLOAD;
D O I
10.2146/ajhp130803
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Purpose. An innovative model for measuring the operational productivity of medication order management in inpatient settings is described. Methods. Order verification within a computerized prescriber order-entry system was chosen as the pharmacy workload driver. To account for inherent variability in the tasks involved in processing different types of orders, pharmaceutical products were grouped by class, and each class was assigned a time standard, or "medication complexity weight" reflecting the intensity of pharmacist and technician activities (verification of drug indication, verification of appropriate dosing, adverse-event prevention and monitoring, medication preparation, product checking, product delivery, returns processing, nurse/provider education, and problem-order resolution). The resulting "weighted verifications" (WV) model allows productivity monitoring by job function (pharmacist versus technician) to guide hiring and staffing decisions. A 9-month historical sample of verified medication orders was analyzed using the WV model, and the calculations were compared with values derived from two established models one based on the Case Mix Index (CM!) and the other based on the proprietary Pharmacy Intensity Score (PIS). Results. Evaluation of Pearson correlation coefficients indicated that values calculated using the WV model were highly correlated with those derived from the CMIand PIS-based models (r = 0.845 and 0.886, respectively). Relative to the comparator models, the WV model offered the advantage of less period-to-period variability. Conclusion. The WV model yielded productivity data that correlated closely with values calculated using two validated workload management models. The model may be used as an alternative measure of pharmacy operational productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 211
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Creating pharmacy staffing-to-demand models: Predictive tools used at two institutions [J].
Krogh, Paul ;
Ernster, Jason ;
Knoer, Scott .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2012, 69 (18) :1574-1580
[2]   Development of clinical pharmacy productivity metrics [J].
Pawloski, Pamala ;
Cusick, Dona ;
Amborn, Lori .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2012, 69 (01) :49-54
[3]   Effective use of workload and productivity monitoring tools in health-system pharmacy, part 2 [J].
Rough, Steve S. ;
McDaniel, Michael ;
Rinehart, James R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (05) :380-388
[4]   Effective use of workload and productivity monitoring tools in health-system pharmacy, part 1 [J].
Rough, Steve S. ;
McDaniel, Michael ;
Rinehart, James R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (04) :300-311
[5]  
Weber RJ, 2006, HOSP PHARM, V41, P182