Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects

被引:93
作者
Awasthi, Anjali [1 ]
Omrani, Hichem [2 ]
Gerber, Philippe [2 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, CIISE, EV 7-636,1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] CEPS INSTEAD, 3 Ave Fonte, L-4364 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
Multicriteria-decision making; Urban mobility; Sustainability evaluation; TOPSIS; VIKOR; GRA; Fuzzy numbers; TRANSPORT PROJECTS; LAND-USE; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; SCENARIOS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Confronted with negative environmental impacts, rising fuel costs and increasing congestion, many cities are implementing sustainable mobility measures to improve the-flow of passenger and goods. Examples of these measures are use of public transport, cycling, walking, energy efficient vehicles, biofuels. The challenge before transport decision makers is which one(s) to choose for implementation as often there is no or limited quantitative data available on the subject. Moreover, the context of each city, its geographic and transport conditions restrict the generalization of results obtained in experienced cities. In this paper, we are investigating application of ideal solution based multicriteria decision making (MCDM) techniques namely fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR, and fuzzy GRA for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects. A real application for city of Luxembourg is provided. Three projects are evaluated namely implementation of a new tramway in the city center of Luxembourg, re-organization of existing bus lines in the city to perform optimized service, and implementation of electric vehicle car-sharing stations in the city. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the influence of input parameters on modeling results. The proposed work is one of the first few works to investigate application of ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects under uncertainty. Besides, the best alternative is selected using veto thereby overcoming the limitations of single MCDM methods.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MOB 2001 REP
[2]   Transportation projects selection process using fuzzy sets theory [J].
Avineri, E ;
Prashker, J ;
Ceder, A .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 116 (01) :35-47
[3]  
Awasthi A., 2009, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V9, P212, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2009.026943
[4]   Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Omrani, Hichem .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) :12270-12280
[5]   Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (06) :787-796
[6]   Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Fahimnia, Behnam ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 250 (02) :309-340
[7]   The sustainable mobility paradigm [J].
Banister, David .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (02) :73-80
[8]  
Beinat E, 2001, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC, P10
[9]  
Belton Valerie., 2002, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4]
[10]   Sustainable urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches [J].
Black, JA ;
Paez, A ;
Suthanaya, PA .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 128 (04) :184-209