Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Zhu, Yuze [1 ]
Yao, Zichuan [2 ]
Jiang, Yunzhong [2 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Bai, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 SanHao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
biopsy; negative MRI; nomogram; prostate cancer; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; ANTIGEN PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; HYPERPLASIA; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The interpretation of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening results for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade >= group 2) is debatable and poses a clinical dilemma for urologists. No nomograms have been developed to predict csPCa in such populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the probability of csPCa in men with negative MRI (PI-RADS score 1-2) results after transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Methods The development cohort consisted of 728 patients with negative MRI results who underwent subsequent prostate biopsy at our center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. The patients' clinicopathologic data were recorded. The Lasso regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection, then multivariable binary logistic regression was used to build a predictive model with regression coefficients. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 334 consecutive patients from January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The performance of the predictive model was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results The predictors incorporated in this model included age, history of previous negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and lower urinary tract symptoms, with PSAD being the strongest predictor. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.933) and good calibration (unreliability test, p = .540). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was clinically useful. Conclusion This study presents a good nomogram that can aid pre-biopsy risk stratification for the detection of csPCa, and that may help inform biopsy decisions in patients with negative MRI results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 991
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Levy, Micah
    Ratnani, Parita
    Moody, Kate
    Garcia, Mariely
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Parekh, Sneha
    Pandav, Krunal
    Shukla, Bhavya
    Prasad, Sonya
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 28 : 9 - 16
  • [42] Where Do Transrectal Ultrasound- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies Miss Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 110 : 154 - 160
  • [43] 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging improves the prostate cancer detection rate in transrectral ultrasound-guided biopsy
    Chen, Jie
    Yi, Xiao-Lei
    Jiang, Li-Xin
    Wang, Ren
    Zhao, Jun-Gong
    Li, Yue-Hua
    Hu, Bing
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (01) : 207 - 212
  • [44] Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy
    Truong, Matthew
    Frye, Thomas P.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 424 - 431
  • [45] Location and Grade of Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Transperineal Template-guided Mapping Biopsy After Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy
    Bittner, Nathan
    Merrick, Gregory
    Taira, Al
    Bennett, Abbey
    Schattel, Amy
    Butler, Wayne
    Galbreath, Robert
    Adamovich, Edward
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (08): : 723 - 729
  • [46] Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naive Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Gayet, Maudy
    Verbeek, Jan F.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
    Savci-Heijink, C. Dilara
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Gielens, Maaike P. M.
    van der Linden, Hans
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (02): : 109 - 117
  • [47] A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 99 (04) : 384 - 391
  • [48] A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Thangarasu, Mathisekaran
    Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash
    Selvaraj, Nivash
    Bafna, Sandeep
    Paul, Rajesh
    Mahesh, Chandranathan
    Jain, Nitesh
    Balakrishnan, Arunkumar
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 207 - 213
  • [49] Clinicopathological features of prostate cancer in Japanese men diagnosed on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy
    Miyake H.
    Sakai I.
    Harada K.-I.
    Hara I.
    Eto H.
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005, 10 (1) : 30 - 34
  • [50] Importance of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for the detection and monitoring of prostate cancer
    Ganzer, R.
    Brummeisl, W.
    Siokou, F. S.
    Scheck, R.
    Franz, T.
    Ho-Thi, P.
    Mangold, A.
    UROLOGE, 2019, 58 (12): : 1499 - 1508