Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Zhu, Yuze [1 ]
Yao, Zichuan [2 ]
Jiang, Yunzhong [2 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Bai, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 SanHao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
biopsy; negative MRI; nomogram; prostate cancer; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; ANTIGEN PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; HYPERPLASIA; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The interpretation of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening results for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade >= group 2) is debatable and poses a clinical dilemma for urologists. No nomograms have been developed to predict csPCa in such populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the probability of csPCa in men with negative MRI (PI-RADS score 1-2) results after transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Methods The development cohort consisted of 728 patients with negative MRI results who underwent subsequent prostate biopsy at our center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. The patients' clinicopathologic data were recorded. The Lasso regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection, then multivariable binary logistic regression was used to build a predictive model with regression coefficients. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 334 consecutive patients from January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The performance of the predictive model was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results The predictors incorporated in this model included age, history of previous negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and lower urinary tract symptoms, with PSAD being the strongest predictor. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.933) and good calibration (unreliability test, p = .540). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was clinically useful. Conclusion This study presents a good nomogram that can aid pre-biopsy risk stratification for the detection of csPCa, and that may help inform biopsy decisions in patients with negative MRI results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 991
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
    Huang, Cong
    Song, Gang
    Wang, He
    Ji, Guangjie
    Li, Jie
    Chen, Yuke
    Fan, Yu
    Fang, Dong
    Xiong, Gengyan
    Xin, Zhongcheng
    Zhou, Liqun
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [32] Magnetic resonance imaging-directed biopsy improves the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness compared with a 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Zhang, Jie
    Xiu, Jianjun
    Dong, Yin
    Wang, Muwen
    Han, Xue
    Qin, Yejun
    Huang, Zhaoqin
    Cai, Shifeng
    Yuan, Xianshun
    Liu, Qingwei
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2014, 9 (05) : 1989 - 1997
  • [33] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment categories
    John, Susan
    Cooper, Steven
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Cagiannos, Ilias
    Lavallee, Luke T.
    Morash, Christopher
    O'Sullivan, Joseph
    Schieda, Nicola
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (12): : 401 - 406
  • [34] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Combined with PET/Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Can Diagnose Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Biopsy Results
    Liu, Chen
    Liu, Teli
    Zhang, Zhongyi
    Zhang, Ning
    Dui, Peng
    Yang, Yong
    Liu, Yiqiang
    Yus, Wei
    Li, Nan
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Zhu, Hua
    Yang, Kun
    Yang, Zhi
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (09) : 1314 - 1319
  • [35] SYSTEMATIC TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY AFTER NEGATIVE DIGITALLY DIRECTED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    LIPPMAN, HR
    GHIATAS, AA
    SAROSDY, MF
    STAMEY, TA
    RESNICK, MI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 827 - 829
  • [36] A Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
    Hu, Jieping
    Yu, Yue
    Liu, Wei
    Peng, Zhixiong
    Guo, Ju
    Xi, Haibo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 84 (06) : 1217 - 1224
  • [37] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Eastham, James A.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Abida, Wassim
    Scher, Howard I.
    Sidlow, Robert
    Becker, Anton S.
    Wibmer, Andreas G.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (06): : 605 - 616
  • [38] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Chung, Paul H.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Baccala, Angelo A., Jr.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Benjamin, Compton J.
    Xu, Sheng
    Yan, Pingkun
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Chua, Celene
    Locklin, Julia K.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Gates, Stacey P.
    Buckner, Carey
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Glossop, Neil D.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1281 - 1285
  • [39] A Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Ultrasound-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy
    Jieping Hu
    Yue Yu
    Wei Liu
    Zhixiong Peng
    Ju Guo
    Haibo Xi
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84 : 1217 - 1224
  • [40] Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study
    Pham, Trang H. N.
    Schulze-Hagen, Maximilian F.
    Rahnama'i, Mohammad S.
    CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (02)