Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

被引:5
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Zhu, Yuze [1 ]
Yao, Zichuan [2 ]
Jiang, Yunzhong [2 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Bai, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 SanHao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
biopsy; negative MRI; nomogram; prostate cancer; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; ANTIGEN PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; HYPERPLASIA; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The interpretation of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening results for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade >= group 2) is debatable and poses a clinical dilemma for urologists. No nomograms have been developed to predict csPCa in such populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the probability of csPCa in men with negative MRI (PI-RADS score 1-2) results after transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Methods The development cohort consisted of 728 patients with negative MRI results who underwent subsequent prostate biopsy at our center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. The patients' clinicopathologic data were recorded. The Lasso regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection, then multivariable binary logistic regression was used to build a predictive model with regression coefficients. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 334 consecutive patients from January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The performance of the predictive model was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results The predictors incorporated in this model included age, history of previous negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and lower urinary tract symptoms, with PSAD being the strongest predictor. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.933) and good calibration (unreliability test, p = .540). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was clinically useful. Conclusion This study presents a good nomogram that can aid pre-biopsy risk stratification for the detection of csPCa, and that may help inform biopsy decisions in patients with negative MRI results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 991
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   ZONAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - CORRELATION WITH HISTOLOGIC PATTERN AND DIRECTION OF SPREAD [J].
MCNEAL, JE ;
REDWINE, EA ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1988, 12 (12) :897-906
[22]   Interpreting results of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer [J].
Meigs, JB ;
Barry, MJ ;
Oesterling, JE ;
Jacobsen, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (09) :505-512
[23]   EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent [J].
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Briers, Erik ;
Cumberbatch, Marcus G. ;
De Santis, Maria ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Gross, Tobias ;
Henry, Ann M. ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Mason, Malcolm D. ;
Matveev, Vsevolod B. ;
Moldovan, Paul C. ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Van den Broeck, Thomas ;
van der Poel, Henk G. ;
van der Kwast, Theo H. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Cornford, Philip .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) :618-629
[24]   Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer [J].
Nordstrom, Tobias ;
Akre, Olof ;
Aly, Markus ;
Gronberg, Henrik ;
Eklund, Martin .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2018, 21 (01) :57-63
[25]   Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer? [J].
Oishi, Masakatsu ;
Shin, Toshitaka ;
Ohe, Chisato ;
Nassiri, Nima ;
Palmer, Suzanne L. ;
Aron, Manju ;
Ashrafi, Akbar N. ;
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. ;
Chen, Frank ;
Duddalwar, Vinay ;
Stern, Mariana C. ;
Ukimura, Osamu ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (02) :268-276
[26]   Association of Clinical Benign Prostate Hyperplasia with Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Revisited: A Nationwide Cohort Study of 3 009 258 Men [J].
Orsted, David D. ;
Bojesen, Stig E. ;
Nielsen, Sune F. ;
Nordestgaard, Borge G. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 60 (04) :691-698
[27]   Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions [J].
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Barentsz, Jelle .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (03) :385-396
[28]   Predictive Factors of Missed Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers in Men with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Pagniez, M. A. ;
Kasivisvanathan, V. ;
Puech, P. ;
Drumez, E. ;
Villers, A. ;
Olivier, J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (01) :24-32
[29]   Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next? [J].
Panebianco, Valeria ;
Barchetti, Giovanni ;
Simone, Giuseppe ;
Del Monte, Maurizio ;
Ciardi, Antonio ;
Grompone, Marcello Domenico ;
Campa, Riccardo ;
Indino, Elena Lucia ;
Barchetti, Flavio ;
Sciarra, Alessandro ;
Leonardo, Costantino ;
Gallucci, Michele ;
Catalano, Carlo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (01) :48-54
[30]   Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies [J].
Pokorny, Morgan R. ;
De Rooij, Maarten ;
Duncan, Earl ;
Schroeder, Fritz H. ;
Parkinson, Robert ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Thompson, Leslie C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (01) :22-29