Development and validation of a predictive model for determining clinically significant prostate cancer in men with negative magnetic resonance imaging after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

被引:5
作者
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Zhu, Yuze [1 ]
Yao, Zichuan [2 ]
Jiang, Yunzhong [2 ]
Wu, Bin [1 ]
Bai, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shengjing Hosp, 36 SanHao St, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Shengjing Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
biopsy; negative MRI; nomogram; prostate cancer; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; ANTIGEN PSA DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; HYPERPLASIA; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The interpretation of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening results for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (International Society of Urological Pathology grade >= group 2) is debatable and poses a clinical dilemma for urologists. No nomograms have been developed to predict csPCa in such populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting the probability of csPCa in men with negative MRI (PI-RADS score 1-2) results after transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Methods The development cohort consisted of 728 patients with negative MRI results who underwent subsequent prostate biopsy at our center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. The patients' clinicopathologic data were recorded. The Lasso regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection, then multivariable binary logistic regression was used to build a predictive model with regression coefficients. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 334 consecutive patients from January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2020. The performance of the predictive model was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results The predictors incorporated in this model included age, history of previous negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and lower urinary tract symptoms, with PSAD being the strongest predictor. The model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.875 (95% confidence interval, 0.816-0.933) and good calibration (unreliability test, p = .540). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was clinically useful. Conclusion This study presents a good nomogram that can aid pre-biopsy risk stratification for the detection of csPCa, and that may help inform biopsy decisions in patients with negative MRI results.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 991
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Urinary and bowel symptoms in men with and without prostate cancer: Results from an observational study in the Stockholm area [J].
Adolfsson, J ;
Helgason, AR ;
Dickman, P ;
Steineck, G .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 33 (01) :11-16
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[3]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[4]  
Barsouk Adam, 2020, Med Sci (Basel), V8, DOI 10.3390/medsci8030028
[5]   Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: A systematic review of autopsy studies [J].
Bell, Katy J. L. ;
Del Mar, Chris ;
Wright, Gordon ;
Dickinson, James ;
Glasziou, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (07) :1749-1757
[6]   Modern-day prostate cancer is not meaningfully associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: Analysis of a propensity scorematched cohort [J].
Bhindi, Amar ;
Bhindi, Bimal ;
Kulkarni, Girish S. ;
Hamilton, Robert J. ;
Toi, Ants ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Zlotta, Alexandre R. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Fleshner, Neil E. .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 11 (1-2) :41-46
[7]   Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018 [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Catto, James W. F. ;
Cornford, Philip ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Wirth, Manfred ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (03) :357-368
[8]   Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review [J].
Caverly, Tanner J. ;
Hayward, Rodney A. ;
Reamer, Elyse ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. ;
Connochie, Daniel ;
Heisler, Michele ;
Fagerlin, Angela .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (06)
[9]   Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis [J].
Cohen, Michael S. ;
Hanley, Robert S. ;
Kurteva, Teodora ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Silverman, Mark L. ;
Sorcini, Andrea ;
Hamawy, Karim ;
Roth, Robert A. ;
Tuerk, Ingolf ;
Libertino, John A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :371-381
[10]   The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction [J].
Distler, Florian A. ;
Radtke, Jan P. ;
Bonekamp, David ;
Kesch, Claudia ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Wieczorek, Kathrin ;
Kirchner, Marietta ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Hohenfellner, Markus ;
Hadaschikk, Boris A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) :575-582