Spontaneous Task Structure Formation Results in a Cost to Incidental Memory of Task Stimuli

被引:4
作者
Bejjani, Christina [1 ,2 ]
Egner, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
cognitive control; attention; memory; structure learning; cognitive flexibility; COGNITIVE CONTROL; WORKING-MEMORY; MEDIA MULTITASKING; REINFORCEMENT; SET; INTERFERENCE; FLEXIBILITY; SYSTEMS; SWITCH;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02833
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans are characterized by their ability to leverage rules for classifying and linking stimuli to context-appropriate actions. Previous studies have shown that when humans learn stimulus-response associations for two-dimensional stimuli, they implicitly form and generalize hierarchical rule structures (task-sets). However, the cognitive processes underlying structure formation are poorly understood. Across four experiments, we manipulated how trial-unique images mapped onto responses to bias spontaneous task-set formation and investigated structure learning through the lens of incidental stimulus encoding. Participants performed a learning task designed to either promote task-set formation (by "motor-clustering" possible stimulus-action rules), or to discourage it (by using arbitrary category-response mappings). We adjudicated between two hypotheses: Structure learning may promote attention to task stimuli, thus resulting in better subsequent memory. Alternatively, building task-sets might impose cognitive demands (for instance, on working memory) that divert attention away from stimulus encoding. While the clustering manipulation affected task-set formation, there were also substantial individual differences. Importantly, structure learning incurred a cost: spontaneous task-set formation was associated with diminished stimulus encoding. Thus, spontaneous hierarchical task-set formation appears to involve cognitive demands that divert attention away from encoding of task stimuli during structure learning.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Explicit Goal-Driven Attention, Unlike Implicitly Learned Attention, Spreads to Secondary Tasks [J].
Addleman, Douglas A. ;
Tao, Jinyi ;
Remington, Roger W. ;
Jiang, Yuhong V. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (03) :356-366
[2]  
Allen Micah, 2019, Wellcome Open Res, V4, P63, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1
[3]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HIPPOCAMPUS CELS SYS
[5]   Human category learning [J].
Ashby, EG ;
Maddox, WT .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 56 :149-178
[6]   Human category learning 2.0 [J].
Ashby, F. Gregory ;
Maddox, W. Todd .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 1224 :147-161
[7]   A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Alfonso-Reese, LA ;
Turken, AU ;
Waldron, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) :442-481
[8]   Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules [J].
Badre, David ;
Kayser, Andrew S. ;
D'Esposito, Mark .
NEURON, 2010, 66 (02) :315-326
[9]   The Intrinsic Memorability of Face Photographs [J].
Bainbridge, Wilma A. ;
Isola, Phillip ;
Oliva, Aude .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2013, 142 (04) :1323-1334
[10]   Control by association: Transfer of implicitly primed attentional states across linked stimuli [J].
Bejjani, Christina ;
Zhang, Ziwei ;
Egner, Tobias .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) :617-626