Phylogenetics of advanced snakes (Caenophidia) based on four mitochondrial genes

被引:87
作者
Kelly, CMR [1 ]
Barker, NP
Villet, MH
机构
[1] Rhodes Univ, Dept Zool & Entomol, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[3] Rhodes Univ, Dept Bot, Mol Ecol & Systemat Facil, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
advanced snakes; Bayesian analysis; Caenophidia; Colubroidea; data combination; maximum likelihood; maximum parsimony; mitochondrial DNA; supertrees;
D O I
10.1080/10635150390218132
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Phylogenetic relationships among advanced snakes (Acrochordus+Colubroidea+Caenophidia) and the position of the genus Acrochordus relative to colubroid taxa are contentious. These concerns were investigated by phylogenetic analysis of fragments from four mitochondrial genes representing 62 caenophidian genera and 5 noncaenophidian taxa. Four methods of phylogeny reconstruction were applied: matrix representation with parsimony (MRP) supertree consensus, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analysis. Because of incomplete sampling, extensive missing data were inherent in this study. Analyses of individual genes retrieved roughly the same clades, but branching order varied greatly between gene trees, and nodal support was poor. Trees generated from combined data sets using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analysis had medium to low nodal support but were largely congruent with each other and with MRP supertrees. Conclusions about caenophidian relationships were based on these combined analyses. The Xenoderminae, Viperidae, Pareatinae, Psammophiinae, Pseudoxyrophiinae, Homalopsinae, Natricinae, Xenodontinae, and Colubrinae (redefined) emerged as monophyletic, whereas Lamprophiinae, Atractaspididae, and Elapidae were not in one or more topologies. A clade comprising Acrochordus and Xenoderminae branched closest to the root, and when Acrochordus was assessed in relation to a colubroid subsample and all five noncaenophidians, it remained associated with the Colubroidea. Thus, Acrochordus+Xenoderminae appears to be the sister group to the Colubroidea, and Xenoderminae should be excluded from Colubroidea. Within Colubroidea, Viperidae was the most basal clade. Other relationships appearing in all final topologies were (1) a clade comprising Psammophiinae, Lamprophiinae, Atractaspididae, Pseudoxyrophiinae, and Elapidae, within which the latter four taxa formed a subclade, and (2) a clade comprising Colubrinae, Natricinae, and Xenodontinae, within which the latter two taxa formed a subclade. Pareatinae and Homalopsinae were the most unstable clades.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 459
页数:21
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Anderson JS, 2001, SYST BIOL, V50, P170
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ATLAS SNAKES WORLD
[4]  
Bininda-Emonds ORP, 1998, BIOL J LINN SOC, V64, P101
[5]  
Bininda-Emonds ORP, 1998, SYST BIOL, V47, P497
[6]  
BOGERT C. M., 1940, BULL AMER MUS NAT HIST, V77, P1
[7]  
Bourgeois M., 1968, PUBLICATIONS U OFFIC, V18, P1
[8]   More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - Case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae) [J].
Bremer, B ;
Jansen, RK ;
Oxelman, B ;
Backlund, M ;
Lantz, H ;
Kim, KJ .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1999, 48 (03) :413-435
[9]  
CADLE J E, 1987, P77
[10]   MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF NEOTROPICAL XENODONTINE SNAKES .3. OVERVIEW OF XENODONTINE PHYLOGENY AND THE HISTORY OF NEW WORLD SNAKES [J].
CADLE, JE .
COPEIA, 1984, (03) :641-652