CLINICAL APPLICATION OF HIGH-DOSE, IMAGE-GUIDED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

被引:23
|
作者
Bayley, Andrew [1 ]
Rosewall, Tara
Craig, Tim
Bristow, Rob
Chung, Peter
Gospodarowicz, Mary
Menard, Cynthia
Milosevic, Michael
Warde, Padraig
Catton, Charles
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2010年 / 77卷 / 02期
关键词
Dose escalation; Pelvic radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Toxicity; CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; ACUTE TOXICITY; WHOLE-PELVIS; ESCALATION; NEOADJUVANT; IRRADIATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the feasibility and early toxicity of dose-escalated image-guided IMRT to the pelvic lymph nodes (LN), prostate (P), and seminal vesicles (SV). Methods and Materials: A total of 103 high-risk prostate cancer patients received two-phase, dose-escalated, image-guided IMRT with 3 years of androgen deprivation therapy. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) were delineated using computed tomography/magnetic resonance co-registration and included the prostate, portions of the SV, and the LN. Planning target volume margins (PTV) used were as follows: P (10 mm, 7 mm posteriorly), SV (10 mm), and LN (5 mm). Organs at risk (OaR) were the rectal and bladder walls, femoral heads, and large and small bowel. The IMRT was planned with an intended dose of 55.1 Gy in 29 fractions to all CTVs (Phase 1), with P+SV consecutive boost of 24.7 Gy in 13 fractions. Daily online image guidance was performed using bony landmarks and intraprostatic markers. Feasibility criteria included delivery of intended doses in 80% of patients, 95% of CTV displacements incorporated within PTV during Phase 1, and acute toxicity rate comparable to that of lower-dose pelvic techniques. Results: A total of 91 patients (88%) received the total prescription dose. All patients received at least 72 Gy. In Phase 1, 63 patients (61%) received the intended 55.1 Gy, whereas 87% of patients received at least 50 Gy. Dose reductions were caused by small bowel and rectal wall constraints. All CTVs received the planned dose in >95% of treatment fractions. There were no Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicities greater than Grade 3, although there were five incidences equivalent to Grade 3 within a median follow-up of 23 months. Conclusion: These results suggest that dose escalation to the PLN+P+SV using IMRT is feasible, with acceptable rates of acute toxicity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY IN AN ACCELERATED PARTIAL BREAST INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY PROTOCOL
    Leonard, Charles E.
    Tallhamer, Michael
    Johnson, Tim
    Hunter, Kari
    Howell, Kathryn
    Kercher, Jane
    Widener, Jodi
    Kaske, Terese
    Paul, Devchand
    Sedlacek, Scot
    Carter, Dennis L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (02): : 528 - 534
  • [32] Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Dang, Audrey
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Cao, Minsong
    Agazaryan, Nzhde
    Kishan, Amar U.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 308 - 320
  • [33] Potential applications of image-guided radiotherapy for radiation dose escalation in patients with early stage high-risk prostate cancer
    Nguyen, Nam P.
    Davis, Rick
    Bose, Satya R.
    Dutta, Suresh
    Vinh-Hung, Vincent
    Chi, Alexander
    Godinez, Juan
    Desai, Anand
    Woods, William
    Altdorfer, Gabor
    D'Andrea, Mark
    Karlsson, Ulf
    Vo, Richard A.
    Sroka, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [34] Clinical effect of multileaf collimator width on the incidence of late rectal bleeding after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma
    Inokuchi, Haruo
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    Norihisa, Yoshiki
    Takayama, Kenji
    Ikeda, Itaru
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (01) : 156 - 161
  • [35] Quality of Life After Hypofractionated Concomitant Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Boost for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Quon, Harvey
    Cheung, Patrick C. F.
    Loblaw, D. Andrew
    Morton, Gerard
    Pang, Geordi
    Szumacher, Ewa
    Danjoux, Cyril
    Choo, Richard
    Kiss, Alex
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Deabreu, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : 617 - 623
  • [36] Image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy in definitive radiotherapy for 1433 patients with cervical cancer
    Wang, Weiping
    Zhang, Fuquan
    Hu, Ke
    Hou, Xiaorong
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (03) : 444 - 448
  • [37] Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study
    Kubo, Nobuteru
    Kawamura, Hidemasa
    Oike, Takahiro
    Sato, Hiro
    Iwanaga, Mototaro
    Mizukami, Tatsuji
    Adachi, Akiko
    Matsui, Hiroshi
    Ito, Kazuto
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    Nakano, Takashi
    IN VIVO, 2019, 33 (04): : 1235 - 1241
  • [38] A MATCHED CONTROL ANALYSIS OF ADJUVANT AND SALVAGE HIGH-DOSE POSTOPERATIVE INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Ost, Piet
    De Troyer, Bart
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Oosterlinck, Willem
    De Meerleer, Gert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05): : 1316 - 1322
  • [39] Urethral toxicity vs. cancer control-Lessons to be learned from high-dose rate brachytherapy combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Rentsch, Cyrill A.
    Isaak, Bernhard
    Behrensmeier, Frank
    Thalmann, George N.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2011, 10 (04) : 286 - 294
  • [40] Intrafractional prostate motion during online image guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Budiharto, Tom
    Slagmolen, Pieter
    Haustermans, Karin
    Maes, Frederik
    Junius, Sara
    Verstraete, Jan
    Oyen, Raymond
    Hermans, Jeroen
    Van den Heuvel, Frank
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (02) : 181 - 186