The economic impacts of technology and climate change: New evidence from US corn yields

被引:22
作者
Huffman, Wallace E. [1 ]
Jin, Yu [2 ]
Xu, Zheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Stat & Initiat Quantitat Life Sci, Lincoln, NE USA
关键词
Technical change; Climate change; Weather; Yield potential; Damage abatement; Biotechnology; Corn yields; Nitrogen fertilizer; Midwest US; Agriculture; AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT; RANDOM FLUCTUATIONS; MAIZE; PRODUCTIVITY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12429
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Over the past century, U.S. farmers have been offered a steady stream of new agricultural technologies, and more recently, experienced climate change. Because these two events have been occurring simultaneously, identifying their separate effects is difficult, and misimputation is easy. This article explicitly examines the economics of technical change and the interaction between weather and technology as revealed in a half century of panel data on U.S. Midwest rainfed state-average corn yields. Observed yields reflect two components: yield potential and damage to the potential caused by weather and pests. Yield potential is modeled as a stochastic production frontier where nitrogen fertilization, public corn research, and introduction and adoption of biotech corn seeds impact yield potential and excess heat impacts nitrogen productivity. The yield-damage/damage-control function permits biotech corn plants to abate adverse effects of weather and pest events. Results include the following: nitrogen use, public corn research, and biotech seed-corn adoption increase yield potential; soil moisture stress reduces yield potential, and excess heat severely reduces nitrogen productivity. Biotech corn plants abate yield damage caused by soil moisture stress but not excess heat.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 479
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Abendroth L.J., 2011, Corn growth and development. PMR 1009
[2]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[3]  
Alston JM, 2010, NAT RES MANAG POLICY, V34, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0658-8
[4]   Soil diversity and land use in the United States [J].
Amundson, R ;
Guo, Y ;
Gong, P .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 6 (05) :470-482
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Soils. The 1957 Yearbook of Agriculture
[6]  
Barnes C., 1957, YB AGR, P451
[7]   Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata [J].
Belotti, Federico ;
Daidone, Silvio ;
Ilardi, Giuseppe ;
Ate, Vincenzo .
STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04) :719-758
[8]   Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Modern, Transgenic Insect-Protected Maize Hybrids [J].
Bender, Ross R. ;
Haegele, Jason W. ;
Ruffo, Matias L. ;
Below, Fred E. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (01) :161-170
[9]   Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics, Environment, Ethics, and the Future [J].
Bennett, Alan B. ;
Chi-Ham, Cecilia ;
Barrows, Geoffrey ;
Sexton, Steven ;
Zilberman, David .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 :249-279
[10]   Impacts of potential climate change on selected agroclimatic indices in Atlantic Canada [J].
Bootsma, A ;
Gameda, S ;
McKenney, DW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 85 (02) :329-343