Numerical prediction on the minimum fluidization velocity of a supercritical water fluidized bed reactor: Effect of particle size distributions

被引:28
作者
Zhang, Hao [1 ]
Huang, Yaqin [1 ]
An, Xizhong [1 ]
Yu, Aibing [2 ,3 ]
Xie, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Met, Key Lab Ecol Met Multimetall Mineral, Minist Educ, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Chem Engn, ARC Ind Transformat Res Hub Computat Particle Tec, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Southeast Univ Monash Univ Joint Res Inst, Suzhou Ind Pk, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Minimum fluidization velocity; Supercritical water; Fluidized bed reactor; Particle size distributions; CFD-DEM; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; PARTICULATE SYSTEMS; HEAT-TRANSFER; BUBBLE DYNAMICS; FLOW; SIMULATION; DEM; TEMPERATURES; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.015
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The minimum fluidization velocity of a supercritical water fluidization bed reactor (SCWFBR) is numerically nvestigated based on coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics-Discrete Element Method (CFD-DEM) simulations. The accuracy of the CFD-DEM model is firstly validated via previously published experimental data. Then, the model is adopted to study the effects of particle size distributions (PSD) on the minimum fluidization velocity in which four types of PSD including Gaussian-type, Mono-type, Flat-type and Binary-type are considered. Numerical results show that the minimum fluidization velocity for the Flat-type PSD is the smallest among the four while the one for the Mono-type PSD is the largest. The minimum fluidization velocities for the Mono type and Gaussian-type PSD share quite similar values. However, it is conditionally valid when the largest amount of particle size in the Gaussian-type PSD is equal to its mean particle size which is used in the Mono type PSD. The agreement of the minimum fluidization velocity between Mono-type and Gaussian-type PSD is also influenced by the number of small particles. The mechanism behind these phenomena is revealed by investigating the micro-structure of differently sized particles. Finally, predictive correlations for the minimum fluidization velocity of the SCWFBR are proposed based on the numerical results which demonstrates strong predictive capability for wide PSD. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Prediction of void fraction and minimum fluidization velocity of a binary mixture of particles: Bed material and fuel particles
    Agu, Cornelius Emeka
    Pfeifer, Christoph
    Moldestad, Britt M. E.
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 349 : 99 - 107
  • [2] Evaluation of correlations for minimum fluidization velocity (Umf) in gas-solid fluidization
    Anantharaman, Aditya
    Cocco, Ray A.
    Chew, Jia Wei
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 323 : 454 - 485
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, THERM SCI
  • [4] Babu S.P., 1978, AIChE Symp. Ser, V74, P176
  • [5] Dissolution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in supercritical water in hydrogen production process: A molecular dynamics simulation study
    Ding, Weijing
    Jin, Hui
    Zhao, Qiuyang
    Chen, Bin
    Cao, Wen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (52) : 28062 - 28069
  • [6] ERGUN S, 1952, CHEM ENG PROG, V48, P89
  • [7] Influence of particle size distribution on minimum fluidization velocity and bed expansion at elevated pressure
    Feng, Rongtao
    Li, Junguo
    Cheng, Zhonghu
    Yang, Xin
    Fang, Yitian
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 320 : 27 - 36
  • [8] Influence of the particle size distribution of powders on the velocities of minimum and complete fluidization
    Gauthier, D
    Zerguerras, S
    Flamant, G
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1999, 74 (03) : 181 - 196
  • [9] Gidaspow D., 1994, Multiphase Flow and Fluidization, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-051226-6.50015-7
  • [10] Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water: A systematic experimental and analytical study
    Guo, L. J.
    Lu, Y. J.
    Zhang, X. M.
    Ji, C. M.
    Guan, Y.
    Pei, A. X.
    [J]. CATALYSIS TODAY, 2007, 129 (3-4) : 275 - 286