Care delivery in youth with type 2 diabetes - are we meeting clinical practice guidelines?

被引:8
|
作者
Amed, Shazhan [1 ,2 ]
Nuernberger, Kimberly [3 ]
Reimer, Kim [4 ]
Krueger, Hans [5 ,6 ]
Aydede, Sema K. [6 ,7 ]
Ayers, Dieter [7 ]
Collet, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pediat, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
[2] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[3] Blue Thorn Res & Anal Grp, Victoria, BC, Canada
[4] British Columbia Minist Hlth, Victoria, BC, Canada
[5] H Kruger & Associates Inc, Delta, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[7] Prov Hlth Serv Author, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
children; clinical practice guidelines; quality of care; type; 2; diabetes; youth; QUALITY-OF-CARE; UNITED-STATES; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CHILDREN; ASSOCIATION; ADOLESCENTS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL; VALIDATION; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/pedi.12147
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies indicate high rates of treatment failure and early onset diabetes-related complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aim to describe the quality of care provided to children and youth with T2D. Methods: This prospective cohort study used administrative datasets to describe individuals aged 10-24 yr diagnosed with T2D at < 20 yr of age (488 individuals; 2111 person-years). The primary outcome was being 'at goal' for adherence to Canadian clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This was defined as having either optimal [three diabetes-related physician visits/year, three hemoglobin A1C (A1C) tests/year, and all recommended screening tests for complications (i. e., retinopathy, nephropathy)] or good (two diabetes-related physician visits/year, two A1C tests/year, and at least two screening tests) adherence to CPGs. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling were used. Results: Sixty eight percentage person-years had poor adherence to CPGs (< 2 physician visits and A1c tests/year and no screening tests). Only 29% and 25% were at goal for adherence in the 15-19 and 20-24 yr age groups, respectively. There was a 52% decreased odds of being at goal for adherence 4 yr after diagnosis of T2D (p< 0.001). For every year increase in age at diagnosis, there was a 5% decreased odds of being at goal (p= 0.04). Conclusions: Youth with T2D are not receiving high quality care, and older youth and young adults are particularly at risk. Future research is needed to understand the effectiveness of care in the context of poor adherence as well as patient, physician, and health system factors that might improve adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Type 2 Diabetes in the Pediatric Population: Are We Meeting ADA Clinical Guidelines in Ohio?
    Valent, David
    Pestak, Katie
    Otis, Megan
    Shubrook, Jay
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2010, 49 (04) : 316 - 322
  • [2] Psychosocial Care for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Summary of Reviews to Inform Clinical Practice
    Shapiro, Jenna B.
    Garza, Kimberly P.
    Feldman, Marissa A.
    Suhs, Madeleine C.
    Ellis, Julia
    Terry, Amanda
    Howard, Kelsey R.
    Weissberg-Benchell, Jill
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 53 (01) : 107 - 122
  • [3] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents
    Shah, Amy S.
    Barrientos-Perez, Margarita
    Chang, Nancy
    Fu, Jun-Fen
    Hannon, Tamara S.
    Kelsey, Megan
    Pena, Alexia S.
    Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
    Urakami, Tatsuhiko
    Wicklow, Brandy
    Wong, Jencia
    Mahmud, Farid H.
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2024, 97 (06): : 555 - 583
  • [4] Health care delivery in type 2 diabetes. A survey in an Italian primary care practice
    Modesti, Andrea
    Bartaloni, Roberto
    Bellagamba, Franca
    Caglieri, Rossano
    Cenori, Katia
    Ciampalini, Giorgio
    Costagli, Attilio
    Galloni, Vanni
    Del Papa, Cecilia
    Modesti, Leonardo
    Dell'Omo, Giulia
    Pedrinelli, Roberto
    PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2015, 9 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [5] Clinical trials in youth with type 2 diabetes
    Gemmill, Julie Anne L.
    Brown, Rebecca J.
    Nandagopal, Radha
    Rodriguez, Luisa M.
    Rother, Kristina I.
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2011, 12 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [6] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth
    Zeitler, Phillip
    Arslanian, Silva
    Fu, Junfen
    Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
    Reinehr, Thomas
    Tandon, Nikhil
    Urakami, Tatsuhiko
    Wong, Jencia
    Maahs, David M.
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2018, 19 : 28 - 46
  • [7] ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Psychological care of children, adolescents and young adults with diabetes
    de Wit, Maartje
    Gajewska, Katarzyna A.
    Goethals, Eveline R.
    McDarby, Vincent
    Zhao, Xiaolei
    Hapunda, Given
    Delamater, Alan M.
    DiMeglio, Linda A.
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2022, 23 (08) : 1373 - 1389
  • [8] Assessing diabetes-related quality of life of youth with type 1 diabetes in routine clinical care: the MIND Youth Questionnaire (MY-Q)
    de Wit, Maartje
    Winterdijk, Per
    Aanstoot, Henk-Jan
    Anderson, Barbara
    Danne, Thomas
    Deeb, Larry
    Lange, Karin
    Nielsen, Anja Ostergren
    Skovlund, Soren
    Peyrot, Mark
    Snoek, Frank
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2012, 13 (08) : 638 - 646
  • [9] All together: Integrated care for youth with type 1 diabetes
    Versloot, Judith
    Ali, Amna
    Minotti, Simona C.
    Ma, Julia
    Sandercock, Jane
    Marcinow, Michelle
    Lok, Daphne
    Sur, Deepy
    de Wit, Maartje
    Mansfield, Elizabeth
    Parks, Sheryl
    Zenlea, Ian
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2021, 22 (06) : 889 - 899
  • [10] Satisfaction with the Health Care Provider and Regimen Adherence in Minority Youth with Type 1 Diabetes
    Taylor, Cortney J.
    La Greca, Annette
    Valenzuela, Jessica M.
    Hsin, Olivia
    Delamater, Alan M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2016, 23 (03) : 257 - 268