Multi-criteria decision analysis of agri-food waste as a feedstock for biopolymer production

被引:22
作者
Bolaji, I [1 ]
Nejad, B. [1 ]
Billham, M. [1 ]
Mehta, N. [1 ]
Smyth, B. [1 ]
Cunningham, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Biopolymer; Waste; Multi-criteria analysis; Feedstock; Biomass; CROP RESIDUES; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; BY-PRODUCT; BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; ENERGY; STRAW; AVAILABILITY; CHEMICALS; VALORIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105671
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of renewable resources is becoming increasingly important if we are to address the negative impacts of petroleum-based polymers. Utilising renewable resources, such as agri-food wastes (AFWs), for biopolymer production offers the advantages of lower dependence on fossil fuels, resource recovery (generating added value), and waste management. AFWs are generated as by-products or residues at every stage of the food supply chain: harvest, processing, and post-consumption. AFWs are a significant societal challenge but their full potential as renewable resources remain unexploited. Hence, this study aimed to identify feedstocks that can provide a continuous supply of raw materials for the manufacture of biopolymers. Harvest and process wastes from major crops were assessed using information from published reports and government departments over the period 2013-2017. The analysis was based on criteria focusing on the availability, characteristics, and market value of the identified AFWs. The analysis was conducted for the crops: wheat, barley, oats, rapeseed, sugar beet, carrots, and onions. Total AFW production in the UK over the reference period was estimated at 15 Mt dry matter/yr, to which wheat is the major contributor (approximate to 7 Mt). The results show that harvest residues, e.g., straw, have medium to high theoretical availability and competing uses, whereas processing residues, e.g., onion peels, have low theoretical availability and cost but are well suited for biopolymer production. These findings provide valuable information about resources that will enable potential investors to conduct studies to accurately assess the practicality of valorising AFWs into biopolymers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] Agrocycle, 2016, DAT INV AWCB VAL CHA
  • [2] AHDB, 2014, FEAS LACT AC PROD CE
  • [3] Assessment of feedstocks for biogas production, part II-Results for strategic decision making
    Ammenberg, Jonas
    Feiz, Roozbeh
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 388 - 404
  • [4] Anal A.K., 2018, FOOD PROCESSING BY P
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, HDB BIOPOLYMERS BIOD
  • [6] Characterization of Industrial Onion Wastes (Allium cepa L.): Dietary Fibre and Bioactive Compounds
    Benitez, Vanesa
    Molla, Esperanza
    Martin-Cabrejas, Maria A.
    Aguilera, Yolanda
    Lopez-Andreu, Francisco J.
    Cools, Katherine
    Terry, Leon A.
    Esteban, Rosa M.
    [J]. PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 2011, 66 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [7] Agricultural residue production and potentials for energy and materials services
    Bentsen, Niclas Scott
    Felby, Claus
    Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2014, 40 : 59 - 73
  • [8] Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessments
    Bentsen, Niclas Scott
    Felby, Claus
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2012, 5
  • [9] Process for obtaining cellulose acetate from agricultural by-products
    Biswas, Atanu
    Saha, Badal C.
    Lawton, John W.
    Shogren, R. L.
    Willett, J. L.
    [J]. CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2006, 64 (01) : 134 - 137
  • [10] An integrated biorefinery concept for conversion of sugar beet pulp into value-added chemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates
    Cardenas-Fernandez, Max
    Bawn, Maria
    Hamley-Bennett, Charlotte
    Bharat, Penumathsa K. V.
    Subrizi, Fabiana
    Suhaili, Nurashikin
    Ward, David P.
    Bourdin, Sarah
    Dalby, Paul A.
    Hailes, Helen C.
    Hewitson, Peter
    Ignatova, Svetlana
    Kontoravdi, Cleo
    Leak, David J.
    Shah, Nilay
    Sheppard, Tom D.
    Ward, John M.
    Lye, Gary J.
    [J]. FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2017, 202 : 415 - 431