Policy options to reduce consumer waste to zero: comparing product stewardship and extended producer responsibility for refrigerator waste

被引:17
作者
Nicol, Scott [1 ]
Thompson, Shirley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Inst Nat Resources, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
extended producer responsibility; product stewardship; refrigerator; end-of-life; waste; wmr; 1161-1;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X07079152
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Today, over-consumption, pollution and resource depletion threaten sustainability. Waste management policies frequently fail to reduce consumption, prevent pollution, conserve resources and foster sustainable products. However, waste policies are changing to focus on lifecycle impacts of products from the cradle to the grave by extending the responsibilities of stakeholders to post-consumer management. Product stewardship and extended producer responsibility are two policies in use, with radically different results when compared for one consumer product, refrigerators. North America has enacted product stewardship policies that fail to require producers to take physical or financial responsibility for recycling or for environmentally sound disposal, so that releases of ozone depleting substances routinely occur, which contribute to the expanding the ozone hole. Conversely, Europe's Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive requires extended producer responsibility, whereby producers collect and manage their own post-consumer waste products. WEEE has resulted in high recycling rates of greater than 85%, reduced emissions of ozone-depleting substances and other toxins, greener production methods, such as replacing greenhouse gas refrigerants with environmentally friendly hydrocarbons and more reuse of refrigerators in the EU in comparison with North America.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条