Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic for Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:12
|
作者
Hamill, James K. [1 ,2 ]
Liley, Andrew [3 ]
Hill, Andrew G. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Starship Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Pk Rd,Private Bag 92024, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Starship Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Sch Med, South Auckland Clin Sch, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
appendectomy; appendicitis; child; laparoscopy; local anesthetics; peritoneum; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; DOUBLE-BLIND; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; RELIEF; METAANALYSIS; REDUCTION; CLASSIFICATION; ROPIVACAINE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001882
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intraperitoneal local anesthetic (IPLA) on pain after acute laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Summary of Background: IPLA reduces pain in adult elective surgery. It has not been well studied in acute peritoneal inflammatory conditions. We hypothesized that IPLA would improve recovery in pediatric acute laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: This randomized controlled trial in acute laparoscopic appendectomy recruited children aged 8 to 14 years to receive 20mL 0.25% or 0.125% bupivacaine (according to weight) atomized onto the peritoneum of the right iliac fossa and pelvis, or 20mL 0.9% NaCl control. Unrestricted computer-generated randomization was implemented by surgical nurses. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was pain score. Analysis was by a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Of 184 randomized participants (92 to each group), the final analysis included 88 IPLA and 87 control participants. There was no statistically significant difference in overall pain scores (effect estimate 0.004, standard error 0.028, 95% confidence interval -0.052, 0.061), and no difference in right iliac fossa or suprapubic site-specific pain scores, opioid use, recovery parameters, or complications. No child experienced a complication related to the intervention. Conclusion: IPLA imparted no clinical benefit to children undergoing acute laparoscopic appendectomy and cannot be recommended in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Single-port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials and Nonrandomized Comparative Studies
    Qiu, Jianguo
    Yuan, Haichao
    Chen, Shuting
    He, Zhiliang
    Wu, Hong
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [42] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy
    Garbutt, JM
    Soper, NJ
    Shannon, WD
    Botero, A
    Littenberg, B
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) : 17 - 26
  • [43] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dai, Liping
    Shuai, Jian
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (04) : 542 - 553
  • [44] Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach for laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a randomized trial
    Erten, Ela
    Bahadir, Gokhan Berktug
    Kara, Umut
    Simsek, Fatih
    Atasever, Huseyin Emre
    Kina, Seyyid Furkan
    Ozkan, Yasemin
    SIGNA VITAE, 2024, 20 (10) : 89 - 96
  • [45] Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized, controlled trials
    Slim, K
    Pezet, D
    Chipponi, J
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (03) : 398 - 403
  • [46] Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Ovarian Cyst Resection: Double-blind Multicenter Randomized Control Trial Comparing Intraperitoneal Nebulization and Peritoneal Instillation of Ropivacaine
    Catenacci, Stefano Scalia
    Lovisari, Federica
    Peng, Shuo
    Allegri, Massimo
    Somaini, Marta
    Ghislanzoni, Luca
    Greco, Massimiliano
    Rossini, Valeria
    D'Andrea, Luca
    Buda, Alessandro
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Pellegrino, Antonio
    Sportiello, Debora
    Bugada, Dario
    Ingelmo, Pablo M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 759 - 766
  • [47] A randomized comparison of gasless laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
    Ge, Bujun
    Zhao, Haibo
    Chen, Quanning
    Jin, Wei
    Liu, Liming
    Huang, Qi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2014, 9
  • [48] Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SCAR trial)
    Kang, Sung I. L.
    Woo, In Teak
    Bae, Sung Uk
    Yang, Chun-Seok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY PROTOCOLS, 2021, 25 (01): : 201 - 208
  • [49] Intraumbilical versus periumbilical incision in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Jun Suh
    Hong, Tae Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 33 : 83 - 87
  • [50] Two-trocar appendectomy in children - description of technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
    Salo, Martin
    Jarbur, Emil
    Hambraeus, Mette
    Ohlsson, Bodil
    Stenstrom, Pernilla
    Arnbjornsson, Einar
    BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16