Seismic retrofit of external concrete beam-column joints reinforced by plain bars using steel angles prestressed by cross ties

被引:46
作者
Adibi, Mahdi [1 ,2 ]
Marefat, Mohammad S. [3 ]
Esmaeily, Asad [4 ]
Arani, Kamyar Karbasi [3 ]
Esmaeily, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bojnord, Sch Civil Engn, Earthquake Engn, Bojnurd, Iran
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Univ Tehran, Sch Civil Engn, Struct Engn, Tehran, Iran
[4] Kansas State Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Struct Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
Seismic retrofit external RC concrete beam-column joints; Plain bars; Steel angles prestressed by cross ties; RC-JACKETS; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; EARTHQUAKE; STRENGTH; PRECAST; BOND;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A method for seismic retrofit of beam-column joints, designed without seismic considerations and reinforced by plain bars, is examined. The method, already applied to connections reinforced by deformed bars, has been modified for joints with plain bars. Retrofit of these relatively old connections needs special attention due to the weak steel concrete bond, let alone the lack of seismic consideration in design. In this method, steel angles are placed on the faces of beam-column intersections and are externally fixed by prestressed cross-ties. Five half-scale specimens were tested under cyclic load: two control specimens under two levels of axial load, and three retrofitted specimens with varying dimensions of angles, different number and prestressing rate of cross ties, with and without stiffener plates in the angles. The tests show significant improvement of the retrofitted specimens in terms of protecting the joint region against large deformation, showing more ductile response and higher hysteresis energy capacity, as well as moderate strength improvement. The tests show that the specimen with the minimum level of retrofit, which had the smallest angle, minimum number of cross ties, and lowest rate of prestressing, with no stiffeners, has performed well. Accordingly, the corresponding retrofit measures may be recommended for similar cases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 828
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amorn Pfmanmasa, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P529
[2]  
Angelo Masi, 2009, C REL IT NAT RES PRO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 3742R13 ACI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 374105 ACI
[5]   Analysis of FRP-strengthened RC beam-column joints [J].
Antonopoulos, CP ;
Triantafillou, TC .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 6 (01) :41-51
[6]  
ATC, HDB SEISM EV EX BUIL
[7]  
Ayala D, P 10 C STRUCT FAULTS
[8]  
Barker J., 1979, REINFORCED CONCRETE, VVol. 2
[9]   Influence of hysteretic dampers on the seismic response of reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections [J].
Benavent-Climent, A .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (04) :580-592
[10]  
Braga F., 2009, Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, V3, P52, DOI [10.2174/1874836800903010052, DOI 10.2174/1874836800903010052]