The innovative personality? Policy making and experimentation in an authoritarian bureaucracy

被引:31
作者
Hasmath, Reza [1 ]
Teets, Jessica C. [2 ]
Lewis, Orion A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Middlebury Coll, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
关键词
authoritarian institutions; China; governance; local government; policy innovation; policy makers' personality; risk tolerance; ETHNIC-MINORITIES; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GOVERNANCE; BEHAVIOR; STATE;
D O I
10.1002/pad.1854
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Why do local officials in an authoritarian bureaucracy experiment with policy, even when directed not to do so by central-level officials? This study suggests that policy experimentation in this institutional environment can best be understood as an interaction between the structure in which local officials are embedded and individual-level personality attributes. Leveraging a new data set from a series of original surveys with local policy makers in mainland China, conducted between 2016 and 2018, we discern three baseline personality types: authoritarian, consultative, and entrepreneurial. We thereafter examine the individual-level characteristics of local officials who will innovate irrespective of a centralization of bureaucratic power and interests, as currently experienced under Chinese President Xi Jinping. We find that local policy makers engage in policy innovation when they are more focused on resolving governance problems and that increased risk reduces but does not eliminate their willingness to innovate. Based on these findings, we contend that future studies of policy innovation should use an evolutionary framework to examine the interaction between preferences and selection pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 162
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Introduction: Chinese governance in the era of 'top-level design' [J].
Ahlers, Anna L. .
JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2018, 3 (03) :263-267
[2]  
Ang Y., 2016, CHINA ESCAPED POVERT, DOI DOI 10.7591/9781501705854
[3]   RISK AND INNOVATION Towards a framework for risk governance in public services [J].
Brown, Louise ;
Osborne, Stephen P. .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 15 (02) :186-208
[4]  
Chen X.L., 2009, Public Administration Journal, V2009, P1
[5]   Regulations against revolution: mapping policy innovations in China [J].
Chen, Xuelian ;
Goebel, Christian .
JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2016, 1 (01) :78-98
[6]  
Fewsmith Joseph., 2013, LOGIC LIMITS POLITIC
[7]  
Florini A, 2012, CHINA EXPERIMENTS: FROM LOCAL INNOVATIONS TO NATIONAL REFORM, P1
[8]   Authoritarian versus democratic diffusions: Explaining institutional choices in Russia's local government [J].
Gel'man, Vladimir ;
Lankina, Tomila .
POST-SOVIET AFFAIRS, 2008, 24 (01) :40-62
[9]   Policy Entrepreneurship in China's Response to Urban Poverty [J].
Hammond, Daniel R. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2013, 41 (01) :119-146
[10]  
Hasmath R., 2017, CHINASWORLD, V2, P12