Evaluation of alternate-day valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus disease prevention in moderate risk renal transplant patients: A retrospective observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Bhuwania, Puneet [1 ,2 ]
Veerappan, Ilangovan
Sethuraman, Ramaswami
机构
[1] KG Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] PG Inst, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Cluster of differentiation 3 count; cytomegalovirus; mycophenolic acid area-under-curve; tac trough; vanganciclovir; SOLID-ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; DOSE VALGANCICLOVIR; ORAL GANCICLOVIR; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; RECIPIENTS; EFFICACY; INFECTION; IMPACT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4103/ijot.ijot_84_20
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Despite valganciclovir (VGCV) being the recommended agent for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention, its optimal dose that maintains parity between the efficacies, toxicity profile, and most importantly, the cost has yet to be established. This study is the first to evaluate alternate day versus daily dose of VGCV prophylaxis in CMV prevention in moderate risk renal transplant patients (RTR). Materials and Methods: A single center, retrospective analysis of ninety-nine moderate risk RTR was done. The study participants received VGCV 450 mg/day (n = 49) versus VGCV 450 mg on alternative days (n = 50) for 90-100 days; as a prophylactic strategy against CMV disease. The primary endpoint was CMV disease incidence at 6 months. Graft survival, biopsy-proven rejection, hematological adverse events, opportunistic infections (OIs), and mortality have also been evaluated. Results: CMV disease occurrence at 6 months was zero in both the groups. Immunosuppression (induction and maintenance) were alike in both the groups except for higher tacrolimus trough levels in the 2nd month (P = 0.023) and lower mycophenolate acid area under curve levels in alternate-day group (P = 0.046). No difference was noted in biopsy-proven rejection, graft loss, mortality, and OIs, but leukopenia was more in patients receiving daily VGCV (P <= 0.001), a multivariate logistic regression revealed a higher incidence of leukopenia in the daily group (P = 0.02; odds ratio, 13.6, 95% confidence interval 1.51-122.37). Conclusions: Alternate-day VGCV dosing provides similar efficacy as daily dosing in CMV prevention in D+/R + RTR with reduced leukopenia incidence and significant cost-benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Low- Versus High-dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in High-risk Renal Transplant Recipients
    Gabardi, Steven
    Asipenko, Natalya
    Fleming, James
    Lor, Kevin
    McDevitt-Potter, Lisa
    Mohammed, Anisa
    Rogers, Christin
    Tichy, Eric M.
    Weng, Renee
    Lee, Ruth-Ann
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 (07) : 1499 - 1505
  • [2] Impact of Cytomegalovirus Disease in D plus /R- Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving 6 Months Low-Dose Valganciclovir Prophylaxis
    Luan, F. L.
    Kommareddi, M.
    Ojo, A. O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (09) : 1936 - 1942
  • [3] Valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in thoracic transplant patients: retrospective study of efficacy, safety, and drug exposure
    Lefeuvre, S.
    Chevalier, P.
    Charpentier, C.
    Zekkour, R.
    Havard, L.
    Benammar, M.
    Amrein, C.
    Boussaud, V.
    Lillo-Le Louet, A.
    Guillemain, R.
    Billaud, E. M.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 12 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [4] Role of Secondary Prophylaxis With Valganciclovir in the Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Gardiner, Bradley J.
    Chow, Jennifer K.
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Nierenberg, Natalie E.
    Kent, David M.
    Snydman, David R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (12) : 2000 - 2007
  • [5] Multicenter evaluation of efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in donor and recipient positive (D plus/R plus ) renal transplant recipients
    Heldenbrand, Seth
    Li, Chenghui
    Cross, Rosemary P.
    DePiero, Kelly A.
    Dick, Travis B.
    Ferguson, Kara
    Kim, Miae
    Newkirk, Erin
    Park, Jeong M.
    Sudaria-Kerr, Janice
    Tichy, Eric M.
    Ueda, Kimi R.
    Weng, Renee
    Wisniewski, Jesse
    Gabardi, Steven
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 18 (06) : 904 - 912
  • [6] Risk of cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients on valganciclovir prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kalil, Andre C.
    Mindru, Cezarina
    Botha, Jean F.
    Grant, Wendy J.
    Mercer, David F.
    Olivera, Marco A.
    McCartan, Megan A.
    McCashland, Timothy M.
    Langnas, Alan N.
    Florescu, Diana F.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (12) : 1440 - 1447
  • [7] A retrospective study of cytomegalovirus pneumonia in renal transplant patients
    Dong, Biao
    Wang, Yuantao
    Wang, Gang
    Wang, Weigang
    Zhou, Honglan
    Fu, Yaowen
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (05) : 1111 - 1115
  • [8] Cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk transplant recipients despite ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis
    Akalin, E
    Sehgal, V
    Ames, S
    Hossain, S
    Daly, L
    Barbara, M
    Bromberg, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (06) : 731 - 735
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of low-dose valganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients: A single-center, retrospective analysis
    Gabardi, S
    Magee, CC
    Baroletti, SA
    Powelson, JA
    Cina, JL
    Chandraker, AK
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 24 (10): : 1323 - 1330
  • [10] Tolerability of up to 200days of prophylaxis with valganciclovir oral solution and/or film-coated tablets in pediatric kidney transplant recipients at risk of cytomegalovirus disease
    Varela-Fascinetto, G.
    Benchimol, C.
    Reyes-Acevedo, R.
    Genevray, M.
    Bradley, D.
    Ives, J.
    Silva, H. T., Jr.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 21 (01)