Social Heuristics and Social Roles: Intuition Favors Altruism for Women but Not for Men

被引:220
作者
Rand, David G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brescoll, Victoria L. [3 ]
Everett, Jim A. C. [4 ]
Capraro, Valerio [5 ]
Barcelo, Helene [6 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Econ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[5] Ctr Math & Comp Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Math Sci Res Inst, 1000 Centennial Dr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
altruism; prosociality; intuition; dual process; gender; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SELF-CONTROL; COOPERATION; PROSOCIALITY; DEPLETION; BEHAVIOR; ORIGINS; GENDER; GAME;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000154
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Are humans intuitively altruistic, or does altruism require self-control? A theory of social heuristics, whereby intuitive responses favor typically successful behaviors, suggests that the answer may depend on who you are. In particular, evidence suggests that women are expected to behave altruistically, and are punished for failing to be altruistic, to a much greater extent than men. Thus, women (but not men) may internalize altruism as their intuitive response. Indeed, a meta-analysis of 13 new experiments and 9 experiments from other groups found that promoting intuition relative to deliberation increased giving in a Dictator Game among women, but not among men (Study 1, N = 4,366). Furthermore, this effect was shown to be moderated by explicit sex role identification (Study 2, N = 1,831): the more women described themselves using traditionally masculine attributes (e.g., dominance, independence) relative to traditionally feminine attributes (e.g., warmth, tenderness), the more deliberation reduced their altruism. Our findings shed light on the connection between gender and altruism, and highlight the importance of social heuristics in human prosociality.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 396
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THE 2 SEXES
[2]   Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation [J].
Bear, Adam ;
Rand, David G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (04) :936-941
[3]   UTILITY OF ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ASSESSING PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 45 (02) :196-205
[4]   WHO IS 'BEHAVIORAL'? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES [J].
Benjamin, Daniel J. ;
Brown, Sebastian A. ;
Shapiro, Jesse M. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2013, 11 (06) :1231-1255
[5]   Who Takes the Floor and Why: Gender, Power, and Volubility in Organizations [J].
Brescoll, Victoria L. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2011, 56 (04) :622-641
[6]   PSYCHOLOGICAL SEX-DIFFERENCES - ORIGINS THROUGH SEXUAL SELECTION [J].
BUSS, DM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1995, 50 (03) :164-168
[7]   Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality [J].
Chudek, Maciej ;
Henrich, Joseph .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) :218-226
[8]   Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas [J].
Cone, Jeremy ;
Rand, David G. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)
[9]   Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game [J].
Cornelissen, Gert ;
Dewitte, Siegfried ;
Warlop, Luk .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2011, 37 (08) :1080-1090
[10]  
Eagly A.H., 1987, JOHN M MACEACHRAN ME