A new segmentation strategy for processing magnetic anomaly detection data of shallow depth ferromagnetic pipeline

被引:9
作者
Feng, Shuo [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Dejun [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Xing [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Huafeng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Caifang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Coll Geophys & Informat Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic anomaly magnetic dipole reconstruction segmentation method;
D O I
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.02.009
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Magnetic anomalies produced by underground ferromagnetic pipelines because of the polarization of earth's magnetic field are used to obtain the information on the location, buried depth and other parameters of pipelines. In order to achieve a fast inversion and interpretation of measured data, it is necessary to develop a fast and stable forward method. Magnetic dipole reconstruction (MDR), as a kind of integration numerical method, is well suited for simulating a thin pipeline anomaly. In MDR the pipeline model must be cut into small magnetic dipoles through different segmentation methods. The segmentation method has an impact on the stability and speed of forward calculation. Rapid and accurate simulation of deep-buried pipelines has been achieved by exciting segmentation method. However, in practical measurement, the depth of underground pipe is uncertain. When it comes to the shallow-buried pipeline, the present segmentation may generate significant errors. This paper aims at solving this problem in three stages. First, the cause of inaccuracy is analyzed by simulation experiment. Secondly, new variable interval section segmentation is proposed based on the existing segmentation. It can help MDR method to obtain simulation results in a fast way under the premise of ensuring the accuracy of different depth models. Finally, the measured data is inversed based on new segmentation method. The result proves that the inversion based on the new segmentation can achieve fast and accurate inversion of depth parameters of underground pipes without being limited by pipeline depth. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Magnetic forward modelling and inversion for high susceptibility
    Lelievre, Peter G.
    Oldenburg, Douglas W.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 166 (01) : 76 - 90
  • [12] Magnetic anomalies of steel drums: a review of the literature and research results of the INGV
    Marchetti, Marco
    Sapia, Vincenzo
    Settimi, Alessandro
    [J]. ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 56 (01)
  • [13] McConnell Terence J., 1999, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1999. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, P516
  • [14] Magnetic anomaly inversion using magnetic dipole reconstruction based on the pipeline section segmentation method
    Pan, Qi
    Liu, De-Jun
    Guo, Zhi-Yong
    Fang, Hua-Feng
    Feng, Mu-Qun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (03) : 242 - 258
  • [15] Numerical modeling of higher order magnetic moments in UXO discrimination
    Sanchez, Vinicio
    Li, Yaoguo
    Nabighian, Misac N.
    Wright, David L.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 46 (09): : 2568 - 2583
  • [16] Magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) of ferromagnetic pipelines using principal component analysis (PCA)
    Sheinker, Arie
    Moldwin, Mark B.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 27 (04)
  • [17] A self-constrained inversion of magnetic data based on correlation method
    Sun, Shida
    Chen, Chao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 135 : 8 - 16
  • [18] Xu S. Z., 1983, GEOPHYS GEOCHEM COMP, V4, P1
  • [19] Genetic Algorithm inversion of geomagnetic vector data using a 2.5-dimensional magnetic structure model
    Yamamoto, M
    Seama, N
    [J]. EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2004, 56 (02): : 217 - 227
  • [20] A New Tracking System for Three Magnetic Objectives
    Yang, Wan'an
    Hu, Chao
    Li, Mao
    Meng, Max Q. -H.
    Song, Shuang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2010, 46 (12) : 4023 - 4029