The realized empirical distribution function of stochastic variance with application to goodness-of-fit testing

被引:7
作者
Christensen, Kim [1 ,2 ]
Thyrsgaard, Martin [1 ]
Veliyev, Bezirgen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Econ & Business Econ, CREATES, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
[2] Danish Finance Inst, Frederiksberg, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Empirical processes; Goodness-of-fit; High-frequency data; Microstructure noise; Pre-averaging; Realized variance; Stochastic volatility; KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST; MICROSTRUCTURE NOISE; INTEGRATED VOLATILITY; MODELS; TIME; MARKET; JUMPS; OPTIONS; RETURN; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose a nonparametric estimator of the empirical distribution function (EDF) of the latent spot variance of the log-price of a financial asset. We show that over a fixed time span our realized EDF (or REDF) - inferred from noisy high-frequency data - is consistent as the mesh of the observation grid goes to zero. In a double-asymptotic framework, with time also increasing to infinity, the REDF converges to the cumulative distribution function of volatility, if it exists. We exploit these results to construct some new goodness-of-fit tests for stochastic volatility models. In a Monte Carlo study, the REDF is found to be accurate over the entire support of volatility. This leads to goodness-of-fit tests that are both correctly sized and relatively powerful against common alternatives. In an empirical application, we recover the REDF from stock market high-frequency data. We inspect the goodness-of-fit of several two-parameter marginal distributions that are inherent in standard stochastic volatility models. The inverse Gaussian offers the best overall description of random equity variation, but the fit is less than perfect. This suggests an extra parameter (as available in, e.g., the generalized inverse Gaussian) is required to model stochastic variance. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 583
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Empirical Analysis of Some Nonparametric Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Censored Data
    Balakrishnan, N.
    Chimitova, E.
    Vedernikova, M.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 44 (04) : 1101 - 1115
  • [42] AN OVERVIEW OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR THE POISSON DISTRIBUTION
    Mijburgh, P. A.
    Visagie, I. J. H.
    SOUTH AFRICAN STATISTICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 54 (02) : 207 - 230
  • [43] Goodness-of-fit testing for accident models with low means
    Ye, Zhirui
    Zhang, Yunlong
    Lord, Dominique
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 61 : 78 - 86
  • [44] Goodness-of-fit testing for the Gompertz growth curve model
    Chakraborty B.
    Bhattacharya S.
    Basu A.
    Bandyopadhyay S.
    Bhattacharjee A.
    METRON, 2014, 72 (1) : 45 - 64
  • [45] Use of goodness-of-fit procedures in high dimensional testing
    Spitzner, DJ
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2006, 76 (05) : 447 - 457
  • [46] Goodness-of-fit testing for Weibull-type behavior
    Goegebeur, Yuri
    Guillou, Armelle
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2010, 140 (06) : 1417 - 1436
  • [47] Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Exponential Polynomial Growth Curves
    Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi
    Basu, Ayanendranath
    Bandyopadhyay, Subhadip
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2009, 38 (03) : 340 - 363
  • [48] On testing the goodness-of-fit of nonlinear heteroscedastic regression models
    Diebolt, J
    Zuber, J
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2001, 30 (01) : 195 - 216
  • [49] The Use of Posterior Predictive P-Values in Testing Goodness-of-Fit
    He, Daojiang
    Xu, Xingzhong
    Liu, Xuhua
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2013, 42 (23) : 4287 - 4297
  • [50] Goodness-of-Fit Test for the Bivariate Negative Binomial Distribution
    Novoa-Munoz, Francisco
    Aguirre-Gonzalez, Juan Pablo
    AXIOMS, 2025, 14 (01)