Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related low back pain: A systematic review

被引:75
作者
Williams, R. M.
Westmorland, M. G.
Lin, C. A.
Schmuck, G.
Creen, M.
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, CanChild Ctr Childhood Disabil Res, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
[2] Grand River Hosp, Link With Work, Kitchener, ON, Canada
[3] Manulife Financial, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
low back pain; injured worker; workplace accommodation; return to work; rehabilitation; systematic review; RETURN-TO-WORK; SECONDARY PREVENTION; MINI-INTERVENTION; FOLLOW-UP; DISABILITY; PROGRAM; NURSES; INJURY; TRIAL; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/09638280600841513
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions for injured workers with low back pain (LBP). Method. MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE, and AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) were searched from 1982 to 2005 for peer-reviewed studies of rehabilitation interventions that were provided at the workplace to workers with musculoskeletal work-related LBP. Methodological quality appraisal and data extraction were conducted by five reviewers. Results. Of a total of 1,224 articles that were identified by the search, 15 articles, consisting of 10 studies, were of sufficient quality to be included in the review. The best evidence was that clinical interventions with occupational interventions as well as early return to work/modified work interventions were effective in returning workers to work faster, reducing pain and disability, and decreasing the rate of back injuries. Ergonomic interventions also were found to be effective workplace interventions. Conclusion. The need for further research in this area is necessary to reduce the burden of back pain on employees and their families, employers, and the health care system.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 624
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Evaluation of a program to reduce back pain in nursing personnel [J].
Alexandre, NMC ;
de Moraes, MAA ;
Corrêa, HR ;
Jorge, SA .
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2001, 35 (04) :356-361
[2]   The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions on return-to-work after low back pain; a prospective two year cohort study in six countries on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months [J].
Anema, JR ;
Cuelenaere, B ;
van der Beek, AJ ;
Knol, DL ;
de Vet, HCW ;
van Mechelen, W .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 61 (04) :289-294
[3]   Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: A future challenge? [J].
Anema, JR ;
Steenstra, IA ;
Urlings, IJM ;
Bongers, PM ;
de Vroome, EMM ;
van Mechelen, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (03) :273-281
[4]  
Bakhtiar C.S., 2002, Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, V6, P186
[5]  
BATTIE MC, 1992, SEMIN SPINE SURG, V4, P20
[6]   A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center [J].
Bernacki, EJ ;
Guidera, JA ;
Schaefer, JA ;
Tsai, S .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2000, 42 (12) :1172-1177
[7]  
Brooker AS, 2000, INJURY NEW WORLD WOR
[8]   The association of medical conditions and presenteeism [J].
Burton, WN ;
Pransky, G ;
Conti, DJ ;
Chen, CY ;
Edington, DW .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 46 (06) :S38-S45
[9]  
CATSBARIL WL, 1991, ADULT SPINE PRINCIPL, P850
[10]  
Cooper J E, 1997, Work, V8, P149, DOI 10.3233/WOR-1997-8205