The utility of positron emission tomography in staging of potentially operable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0060 trial

被引:91
作者
Meyers, Bryan F.
Downey, Robert J.
Decker, Paul A.
Keenan, Robert J.
Siegel, Barry A.
Cerfolio, Robert J.
Landreneau, Rodney J.
Reed, Carolyn E.
Balfe, Dennis M.
Dehdashti, Farrokh
Ballman, Karla V.
Rusch, Valerie W.
Putnam, Joe B., Jr.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiothorac Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Univ S Carolina, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Charleston, SC USA
[10] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Thorac Surg, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z0060 is a prospective multi-institutional trial with a primary objective to evaluate whether positron emission tomography ( PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) detects evidence of metastastic disease that precludes esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer who are surgical candidates after routine staging. Methods: Patients with resectable, biopsy-proven carcinoma were enrolled after computed tomography of chest and abdomen demonstrated no evidence of metastasis. FDG-PET was performed according to specified standards. FDG-PET findings suggesting metastases required confirmation and patients without metastases on PET were expected to proceed to surgery. Results: A total of 262 patients were registered. Of these, 199 were deemed eligible and of these, 189 patients were evaluable. Seventy-three patients were ineligible or unevaluable. Reasons for ineligibility included nonresectable disease by routine staging (39), missing or outdated staging procedures (12), PET technical protocol violations (10), no cancer (4), pre-PET induction therapy (3), claustrophobia (1), and other causes (4). There were 145 (78%) patients who went on to have surgery, 42 (22%) who did not, and 2 patients for whom the surgical status was not determined. The reasons for no resection included the following: M1 disease found by PET and confirmed (9), M1 disease found by PET and not confirmed (2), M1 disease at exploration not found by PET (7), decline or death before surgery (10), patient refusal of surgery (7), unresectable local tumor at exploration (5), and extensive N1 disease precluding operation (2). Eight (4.2%) patients undergoing resection had a recurrence in the first 6 months. Conclusions: Although 22% of eligible patients did not undergo esophagectomy, FDG-PET after standard clinical staging for esophageal carcinoma identified confirmed M1b disease in at least 4.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.2%-8.9%) of patients before resection. Unconfirmed PET evidence of M1 disease and regional adenopathy (N1 disease) led to definitive nonsurgical or induction therapy in additional patients.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 745
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Improvement in staging of esophageal cancer with the addition of positron emission tomography
    Block, MI
    Patterson, GA
    Sundaresan, RS
    Bailey, MS
    Flanagan, FL
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Cooper, JD
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (03) : 770 - 776
  • [2] Brücher BLDM, 2001, ANN SURG, V233, P300
  • [3] The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Cerfolio, RJ
    Bryant, AS
    Ohja, B
    Bartolucci, AA
    Eloubeidi, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (06) : 1232 - 1241
  • [4] Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy:: Results of a prospective trial
    Downey, RJ
    Akhurst, T
    Ilson, D
    Ginsberg, R
    Bains, MS
    Gonen, M
    Koong, H
    Gollub, M
    Minsky, BD
    Zakowski, M
    Turnbull, A
    Larson, SM
    Rusch, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) : 428 - 432
  • [5] Staging of esophageal cancer with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
    Flanagan, FL
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Trask, DD
    Sundaresan, SR
    Patterson, GA
    Cooper, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) : 417 - 424
  • [6] PLANNED VERSUS ATTAINED DESIGN IN PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS
    GREEN, SJ
    DAHLBERG, S
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (07) : 853 - 862
  • [7] Value of baseline positron emission tomography for predicting overall survival in patient with nonmetastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma
    Hong, D
    Lunagomez, S
    Kim, EE
    Lee, JH
    Bresalier, RS
    Swisher, SG
    Wu, TT
    Morris, J
    Liao, ZX
    Komaki, R
    Ajani, JA
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (08) : 1620 - 1626
  • [8] Usefulness of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer
    Kato, H
    Kuwano, H
    Nakajima, M
    Miyazaki, T
    Yoshikawa, M
    Masuda, N
    Fukuchi, M
    Manda, R
    Tsukada, K
    Oriuchi, N
    Endo, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (03) : 279 - 283
  • [9] Role of positron emission tomography in staging esophageal cancer
    Luketich, JD
    Schauer, PR
    Meltzer, CC
    Landreneau, RJ
    Urso, GK
    Townsend, DW
    Ferson, PF
    Keenan, RJ
    Belani, CP
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (03) : 765 - 769
  • [10] FDG-PET in the prediction of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer
    Song, SY
    Kim, JH
    Ryu, JS
    Lee, GTH
    Kim, SB
    Park, SI
    Song, HY
    Cho, KJ
    Ahn, SD
    Lee, SW
    Shin, SS
    Choi, EK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (04): : 1053 - 1059