Provincial green economic efficiency of China: A non-separable input-output SBM approach

被引:119
作者
Tao, Xueping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ping [3 ]
Zhu, Bangzhu [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuyi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Jiangmen 529020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangmen Econ Res Ctr, Jiangmen 529020, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green economic efficiency; Non-separable input/output SBM model; Input and output inefficiency; Energy saving and emissions reduction potential; FACTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORTATION; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.133
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Aiming at the undesirable output (CO2 emission) and non-separable inputs and outputs, we employ a non-separable input/output SBM model to measure China's provincial green economic efficiency during 1995-2012. Empirical results indicate that (i) there are larger interregional differences in green economic efficiencies. The highest efficiency of 0.7339 is recorded at the southern coastal region, followed by those at the eastern coastal and northern coastal regions. The lowest efficiency only reaches 0.3049 at the northwestern region. (ii) Energy and CO2 emission are the key factors for green economic efficiencies. (iii) Different regions have different energy-saving and CO2 emission reduction potentials. The southern coastal region should at least save energy of 4.7 million tons of standard coal. The middle Yellow River, northern coastal and northeast regions should save energy as much as 62, 60, 51 million tons of standard coal. CO2 emission excess in the middle Yellow River region reaches 450 million tons in 2012, while CO2 emission excess in the southern coastal region is only 12 million tons. Finally, we propose some target policies to improve China's regional green economic efficiencies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 66
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AS PAC PROD C
[2]  
[Anonymous], OMEGA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EC RES J, DOI DOI 10.1080/14765280802028302
[4]   Ranking trade resistance variables using data envelopment analysis [J].
Badau, Flavius .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 247 (03) :978-986
[5]   Benefit and distance functions [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 70 (02) :407-419
[6]   Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Danao, Denise ;
Zhang, Nan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :277-283
[7]   Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: A cross-country comparison using the directional distance function [J].
Cheng, Gang ;
Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 238 (03) :899-910
[8]  
Cooper W., 2007, Data envelopement analysis. A comprehensive text with models, applications, V2nd
[9]   An empirical study on the influencing factors of transportation carbon efficiency: Evidences from fifteen countries [J].
Cui, Qiang ;
Li, Ye .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 141 :209-217