Comparison of two eyelid speculums and their effect on intraocular pressure in clinically normal cats

被引:1
|
作者
Ghaffari, Masoud Selk [1 ]
Mohitmafi, Soroush [1 ]
Hajizadeh, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Karaj Branch, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Alborz, Iran
关键词
Eyelid speculum; intraocular pressure; IOP; tonometry; MANIPULATION; MEDETOMIDINE;
D O I
10.1177/1098612X19878903
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objectives The present study was undertaken to determine the possible effects of the placement two different types of eyelid speculum on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement in clinically normal cats. Methods Thirty healthy cats were divided randomly into two groups of 15, group B (Barraquer wire speculum) and group W (Williams eye speculum). All cats were sedated with intramuscular medetomidine (Dorbene vet; 100 mu g/kg) then placed in right lateral recumbency, and IOP was recorded in the left eye using a Tono-Pen Vet tonometer without and with an eyelid speculum in place in both groups. Results The without-speculum IOPs for cats in group B and group W were 13.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg and 13.2 +/- 3.6 mmHg, respectively, and did not differ significantly. A significant increase in IOP (19.8 +/- 3.7 mmHg) was observed in group W in with-speculum measurements in comparison to the without-speculum values (P <0.001).There was no significant difference between with- and without-speculum IOP values (13.8 +/- 2.7 mmHg) in group B (P = 1.0). Conclusions and relevance The Barraquer wire speculum has no effect on IOP compared with the Williams eye speculum in normal cats, and may be an appropriate choice in cats for intraocular surgeries that cannot tolerate acute increases in IOP.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 720
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of three methodologies for measuring intraocular pressure in healthy cats
    Ricci, Claudia Lizandra
    Passareli, Joao Victor Goulart Consoni
    Nascimento, Felipe Franco
    Kanashiro, Glaucia Prada
    Zulim, Luis Felipe da Costa
    Giuffrida, Rogerio
    Andrade, Silvia Franco
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2024, 17 (08) : 1803 - 1809
  • [22] Effects of topical corticosteroid administration on intraocular pressure in normal and glaucomatous cats
    Gosling, Allyson A.
    Kiland, Julie A.
    Rutkowski, Lauren E.
    Hoefs, Adam
    Ellinwood, Norman Matthew
    McLellan, Gillian J.
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 19 : 69 - 76
  • [23] Circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in clinically normal donkeys (Equus asinus)
    Ali, Khaled M.
    Abdelgalil, Ahmed I.
    Hassan, Elham A.
    Torad, Faisal A.
    BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM RESEARCH, 2022, 53 (03) : 468 - 477
  • [24] Comparison of the effect of two viscoelastic agents on an early postoperative intraocular pressure
    Kovacevic, S
    Pastar, Z
    Sessa, Z
    Krpina, V
    Paic, E
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2005, 29 : 115 - 117
  • [25] Effect of Manual Eyelid Manipulation on Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Rebound Tonometry
    Baek, SungUk
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Kim, Young Kook
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [26] Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry
    Baek, Sung Uk
    Ha, Ahnul
    Kim, Young Kook
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 102 (11) : 1515 - 1519
  • [27] Effects of ocular administration of ophthalmic 2% dorzolamide hydrochloride solution on aqueous humor flow rate and intraocular pressure in clinically normal cats
    Rankin, Amy J.
    Crumley, William R.
    Allbaugh, Rachel A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2012, 73 (07) : 1074 - 1078
  • [28] EFFECT OF SOTALOL ON NORMAL INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE
    CRICK, RP
    REYNOLDS, P
    LANCET, 1980, 2 (8199): : 857 - 857
  • [29] Effect of acupuncture on intraocular pressure in normal dogs
    Kim, MS
    Seo, KM
    Nam, TC
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 67 (12): : 1281 - 1282
  • [30] Intraocular pressure measurement: Comparison of two tonometers
    Bonnet, L.
    Bellebeau, F.
    Crettet, N.
    Voute, H.
    Descotes, J.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 158 : S78 - S79