Using numerical simulations to compare the fracture toughness values for concrete from the size-effect, two-parameter and fictitious crack models

被引:19
作者
Hanson, JH
Ingraffea, AR
机构
[1] Rose Hulman Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Terre Haute, IN 47803 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fracture toughness; concrete; size-effect model; two-parameter model; fictitious crack model; cohesive crack simulation; data reduction methods;
D O I
10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00163-7
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The size-effect, two-parameter, and fictitious crack models were developed to predict crack growth in materials like concrete that experience tension softening. The three models must predict the same response for infinitely large structures. Therefore, this study evaluates the differences in response for smaller structures. The metric used to compare response is the fracture toughness value required by the model to generate a particular load versus crack mouth opening displacement graph for a single edge specimen loaded in bending. The graphs, including unloading response, were generated numerically using the fictitious crack model and seventeen different sets of property values. The size-effect and two-parameter data reduction methods were then applied to the graphs to determine the associated fracture toughness values. Results of the evaluation indicate that the fracture toughness values for the size-effect and two-parameter models tend to be less than those of the fictitious crack model. However, there is a range of simulated materials for which the models are in reasonable agreement for structures on the scale of standard laboratory specimens. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1027
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Materials and Structures, V23, P461
[2]  
BAZANT ZP, 1987, ACI MATER J, V84, P463
[3]  
BAZANT ZP, 1984, J ENG MECH-ASCE, V110, P518
[4]  
Bittencourt TN, 1995, AM SOC TEST MATER, V1220, P46, DOI 10.1520/STP14584S
[5]  
ELICES M, 1991, ANAL CONCRETE STRUCT, P99
[6]  
GOPALARATNAM VS, 1985, J AM CONCRETE I, V82, P310
[7]  
HANSON JH, 2000, THESIS CORNELL U
[8]  
Hillerborg A., 1976, Cem. Concr. Res., V6, P773, DOI [10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7, DOI 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7]
[9]   A FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS CRITERION FOR CONCRETE [J].
JENQ, YS ;
SHAH, SP .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1985, 21 (05) :1055-1069
[10]  
KITSUTAKA Y, 1994, AMER CONC I, V149, P711