Robustness of asymmetry and coherence of quantum states

被引:247
作者
Piani, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Cianciaruso, Marco [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bromley, Thomas R. [5 ]
Napoli, Carmine [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Johnston, Nathaniel [6 ]
Adesso, Gerardo [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, SUPA, Glasgow G4 0NG, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Phys, Glasgow G4 0NG, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Salerno, Dipartimento Fis ER Caianiello, Via Giovanni Paolo 2, I-84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
[4] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Napoli, Grp Collegato Salerno, Salerno, Italy
[5] Univ Nottingham, Sch Math Sci, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[6] Mt Allison Univ, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Sackville, NB E4L 1E2, Canada
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ENTANGLEMENT;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042107
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Quantum states may exhibit asymmetry with respect to the action of a given group. Such an asymmetry of states can be considered a resource in applications such as quantum metrology, and it is a concept that encompasses quantum coherence as a special case. We introduce explicitly and study the robustness of asymmetry, a quantifier of asymmetry of states that we prove to have many attractive properties, including efficient numerical computability via semidefinite programming and an operational interpretation in a channel discrimination context. We also introduce the notion of asymmetry witnesses, whose measurement in a laboratory detects the presence of asymmetry. We prove that properly constrained asymmetry witnesses provide lower bounds to the robustness of asymmetry, which is shown to be a directly measurable quantity itself. We then focus our attention on coherence witnesses and the robustness of coherence, for which we prove a number of additional results; these include an analysis of its specific relevance in phase discrimination and quantum metrology, an analytical calculation of its value for a relevant class of quantum states, and tight bounds that relate it to another previously defined coherence monotone.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aberg J, ARXIVQUANTPH0612146
[2]   When are correlations quantum? verification and quantification of entanglement by simple measurements [J].
Audenaert, K. M. R. ;
Plenio, M. B. .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2006, 8
[3]   Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information [J].
Bartlett, Stephen D. ;
Rudolph, Terry ;
Spekkens, Robert W. .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2007, 79 (02) :555-609
[4]   Quantifying Coherence [J].
Baumgratz, T. ;
Cramer, M. ;
Plenio, M. B. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2014, 113 (14)
[5]   Quantum nonlocality without entanglement [J].
Bennett, CH ;
DiVincenzo, DP ;
Fuchs, CA ;
Mor, T ;
Rains, E ;
Shor, PW ;
Smolin, JA ;
Wootters, WK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1999, 59 (02) :1070-1091
[6]   Reversible Framework for Quantum Resource Theories [J].
Brandao, Fernando G. S. L. ;
Gour, Gilad .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2015, 115 (07)
[7]   Quantifying entanglement with witness operators [J].
Brandao, FGSL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2005, 72 (02)
[8]   Complementarity relations for quantum coherence [J].
Cheng, Shuming ;
Hall, Michael J. W. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2015, 92 (04)
[9]   A mathematical theory of resources [J].
Coecke, Bob ;
Fritz, Tobias ;
Spekkens, Robert W. .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 250 :59-86
[10]   Conditions for coherence transformations under incoherent operations [J].
Du, Shuanping ;
Bai, Zhaofang ;
Guo, Yu .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2015, 91 (05)