Risk premia in commodity price forecasts and their impact on valuation

被引:8
作者
Hahn, Warren J. [1 ]
DiLellio, James A. [2 ]
Dyer, James S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, 1 Univ Stn,B6000, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Pepperdine Univ, 18111 Von Karman Ave, Irvine, CA 92612 USA
关键词
Natural gas prices; Stochastic process; Kalman filter; Risk premia; Valuation; REAL OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Commodity price driven valuation models require a stochastic price input if the value of managerial flexibility, such as the option to defer investment until the optimal time and the option to abandon a project, is to be estimated. The risk-neutral version of the stochastic price model is typically used in academic work; however, risk-adjusted models of the expected spot price are often used in practice. These two approaches are connected by a risk premium which is unfortunately often difficult to estimate. In this work, we use natural gas futures prices in a Kalman filter approach with maximum likelihood estimation to parameterize the Schwartz and Smith (2000) stochastic price model, and then apply an asset pricing model to address the large uncertainty of the risk premia parameter estimates. To evaluate the impact of the risk premia and other parameters in the two-factor price model on project valuation, we apply the price model to a prototypical shale gas investment, both for a base reference case as well as for cases where there are real options to optimally time decisions to invest or to abandon the project. Using this approach, we are able to determine the implied risk-adjusted discount rate that would be used with the spot price forecast, given the two-factor model risk premia, and we also discuss the impact of the risk premia on project value relative to other model parameters. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 403
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
DUFFIE D., 1992, DYNAMIC ASSET PRICIN
[12]   AN OPTION PRICING APPROACH TO EVALUATING PETROLEUM PROJECTS [J].
EKERN, S .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1988, 10 (02) :91-99
[13]  
Graham J. R., 2015, EQUITY RISK PREMIUM, DOI [10.2139/ssm.2611793, DOI 10.2139/SSM.2611793]
[14]   Discrete time modeling of mean-reverting stochastic processes for real option valuation [J].
Hahn, Warren J. ;
Dyer, James S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 184 (02) :534-548
[15]   A Discrete Time Approach for Modeling Two-Factor Mean-Reverting Stochastic Processes [J].
Hahn, Warren J. ;
Dyer, James S. .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 8 (03) :220-232
[16]  
Harvey A. C., 1989, Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
[17]  
Jafarizadeh Babak., 2012, SPE Economics Management, V4, P158, DOI [10.2118/162862-PA, DOI 10.2118/162862-PA]
[18]  
Kalman R., 1960, Journal of Basic Engineering, V82, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1115/1.3662552, 10.1115/1.3662552]
[19]   A Primer on the Economics of Shale Gas Production Just How Cheap is Shale Gas? [J].
Lake, Larry W. ;
Martin, John ;
Ramsey, J. Douglas ;
Titman, Sheridan .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2013, 25 (04) :87-+
[20]  
Lund M. W., 1999, ANN REAL OPT C REAL