An effect factor approach for quantifying the impact of plastic additives on aquatic biota in life cycle assessment

被引:13
作者
Tang, Yibo [1 ]
Mankaa, Rose Nangah [1 ]
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Mies Van Der Rohe Str 1, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Characterization factor; Ecotoxicity; Industrial ecology; LCA; Marine plastic; Plastic additives; DEBRIS; ECOTOXICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02046-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Plastic pervades now almost every aspect of our daily lives, but this prosperity has led to an increasing amount of plastic debris, which is now widespread in the oceans and represents a serious threat to biota. However, there is a general lack of consideration regarding marine plastic impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA). This paper presents a preliminary approach to facilitate the characterization of chemical impacts related to marine plastic within the LCA framework. Methods A literature review was carried out first to summarize the current state of research on the impact assessment of marine plastic. In recent years, efforts have been made to develop LCA-compliant indicators and models that address the impact of marine littering, entanglement, and ingestion. The toxicity of plastic additives to marine biota is currently a less understood impact pathway and also the focus of this study. Relevant ecotoxicity data were collected from scientific literature for a subsequent additive-specific effect factor (EF) development, which was conducted based on the USEtox approach. Extrapolation factors used for the data conversion were also extracted from reliable sources. Results and discussion EFs were calculated for six commonly used additives to quantify their toxicity impacts on aquatic species. Triclosan shows an extremely high level of toxicity, while bisphenol A and bisphenol F are considered less toxic according to the results. Apart from additive-specific EFs, a generic EF was also generated, along with the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) illustrating the gathered data used to calculate this EF. Further ecotoxicity data are expected to expand the coverage of additives and species for deriving more robust EFs. In addition, a better understanding of the interactive effect between polymers and additives needs to be developed. Conclusions This preliminary work provides a first step towards including the impact of plastic-associated chemicals in LCA. Although the toxicity of different additives to aquatic biota may vary significantly, it is recommended to consider additives within the impact assessment of marine plastic. The generic EF can be used, together with a future EF for adsorbed environmental pollutants, to fill a gap in the characterization of plastic-related impacts in LCA.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 572
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment [J].
Grant, Aneurin ;
Ries, Robert .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2013, 41 (02) :168-186
[42]   Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment [J].
Crenna, Eleonora ;
Sala, Serenella ;
Polce, Chiara ;
Collina, Elena .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :525-536
[43]   Handling uncertainties inherited in life cycle inventory and life cycle impact assessment method for improved life cycle assessment of wastewater sludge treatment [J].
Alyaseri, Isam ;
Zhou, Jianpeng .
HELIYON, 2019, 5 (11)
[44]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) of road drainage systems for sustainability evaluation: Quantifying the contribution of different life cycle phases [J].
Fathollahi, Alireza ;
Coupe, Stephen J. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 776
[45]   The Impact Assessment of Campus Buildings Based on a Life Cycle Assessment-Life Cycle Cost Integrated Model [J].
Xue, Zhuyuan ;
Liu, Hongbo ;
Zhang, Qinxiao ;
Wang, Jingxin ;
Fan, Jilin ;
Zhou, Xia .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
[46]   Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach [J].
Tuncok-Cesme, Borce ;
Yildiz-Geyhan, Eren ;
Ciftcioglu, Gokcen Alev .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (08)
[47]   Life cycle assessment comparison of wooden and plastic pallets in the grocery industry [J].
Anil, Sebastian K. ;
Ma, Junfeng ;
Kremer, Gul E. ;
Ray, Charles David ;
Shahidi, Shirin M. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (04) :871-886
[48]   A complete life cycle assessment of high density polyethylene plastic bottle [J].
Treenate, P. ;
Limphitakphong, N. ;
Chavalparit, O. .
2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS (ICEMA2017), 2017, 222
[49]   Critical Evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment Analyses of Plastic Waste Pyrolysis [J].
Costa, Laura Pires ;
Vaz de Miranda, Debora Micheline ;
Pinto, Jose Carlos .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (12) :3799-3807
[50]   Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies [J].
Alhazmi, Hatem ;
Almansour, Faris H. ;
Aldhafeeri, Zaid .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)