Differences of osteoblastic bone metastases and osteolytic bone metastases in clinical features and molecular characteristics

被引:39
作者
Fang, J. [1 ]
Xu, Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Sch Med, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bone metastases; Differences; Clinical features; Molecular characteristics; Bone targets; HORMONE-RELATED PROTEIN; BREAST-CANCER CELLS; RESISTANT PROSTATE-CANCER; SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS; ZOLEDRONIC ACID; TGF-BETA; ENDOTHELIN-1; PRODUCTION; RANDOMIZED PHASE-3; ADJUVANT TREATMENT; ZIBOTENTAN ZD4054;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-014-1247-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Several cancers tend to metastasize to bone, leading to osteolytic or osteoblastic bone lesions. The respective phenotypes of bone destruction and bone formation vary in clinical features, including incidence, prognosis, skeletal-related events and bone biomarkers. In addition, different molecular mechanisms explain the difference in phenotype. For example, molecules involved in osteolytic bone metastases (represented with breast cancer) include parathyroid hormone-related protein, transforming growth factor-beta, while in osteoblastic lesions (represented with prostate cancer), endothelin-1 and morphogenetic proteins, etc. play a more important role in bone formation. It is important for us to understand the differences of bone metastases between two phenotypes to help clinicians to understand the underlying mechanisms, behaviors and therapies in development and currently available for bone metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Guidance on the use of bisphosphonates in solid tumours:: recommendations of an international expert panel [J].
Aapro, M. ;
Abrahamsson, P. A. ;
Body, J. J. ;
Coleman, R. E. ;
Colomer, R. ;
Costa, L. ;
Crino, L. ;
Dirix, L. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Gralow, J. ;
Hadji, P. ;
Hortobagyi, G. N. ;
Jonat, W. ;
Lipton, A. ;
Monnier, A. ;
Paterson, A. H. G. ;
Rizzoli, R. ;
Saad, F. ;
Thuerlimann, B. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) :420-432
[2]   Bone morphogenetic protein 6 in skeletal metastases from prostate cancer and other common human malignancies [J].
Autzen, P ;
Robson, CN ;
Bjartell, A ;
Malcolm, AJ ;
Johnson, MI ;
Neal, DE ;
Hamdy, FC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (09) :1219-1223
[3]  
BAYLINK DJ, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, pS565
[4]   Tumor-derived interleukin-8 stimulates osteolysis independent of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand pathway [J].
Bendre, MS ;
Margulies, AG ;
Walser, B ;
Akel, NS ;
Bhattacharrya, S ;
Skinner, RA ;
Swain, F ;
Ramani, V ;
Mohammad, KS ;
Wessner, LL ;
Martinez, A ;
Guise, TA ;
Chirgwin, JM ;
Gaddy, D ;
Suva, LJ .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (23) :11001-11009
[5]   Bone turnover markers as predictors of skeletal complications in prostate cancer, lung cancer, and other solid tumors [J].
Brown, JE ;
Cook, RJ ;
Major, P ;
Lipton, A ;
Saad, F ;
Smith, M ;
Lee, KA ;
Zheng, M ;
Hei, YJ ;
Coleman, RE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (01) :59-69
[6]   TGF-beta in the Bone Microenvironment: Role in Breast Cancer Metastases [J].
Buijs, Jeroen T. ;
Stayrook, Keith R. ;
Guise, Theresa A. .
CANCER MICROENVIRONMENT, 2011, 4 (03) :261-281
[7]   Breast cancer metastasis to the bone: mechanisms of bone loss [J].
Chen, Yu-Chi ;
Sosnoski, Donna M. ;
Mastro, Andrea M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (06)
[8]  
Clines Gregory A., 2008, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, V10, P1, DOI 10.1017/S1462399408000616
[9]   Dickkopf homolog 1 mediates endothelin-1-stimulated new bone formation [J].
Clines, Gregory A. ;
Mohammad, Khalid S. ;
Bao, Yongde ;
Stephens, Owen W. ;
Suva, Larry J. ;
Shaughnessy, John D., Jr. ;
Fox, Jay W. ;
Chirgwin, John M. ;
Guise, Theresa A. .
MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :486-498
[10]   Predictive value of bone resorption and formation markers in cancer patients with bone metastases receiving the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid [J].
Coleman, RE ;
Major, P ;
Lipton, A ;
Brown, JE ;
Lee, KA ;
Smith, M ;
Saad, F ;
Zheng, M ;
Hei, YJ ;
Seaman, J ;
Cook, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (22) :4925-4935