A combined SAR Doppler centroid estimation scheme based upon signal phase

被引:84
作者
Wong, F [1 ]
Cumming, IG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT ELECT ENGN,VANCOUVER,BC V6T 1Z4,CANADA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 1996年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1109/36.499749
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper describes a complete end-to-end Doppler centroid estimation scheme, which determines the fractional PRF part of the Doppler centroid. It also resolves the Doppler ambiguity. Experiments show that the scheme works successfully over various terrain types, including land, water, and ice, and that it requires only a modest amount of SAR data to perform reliably. The proposed scheme has an added advantage that it is directly applicable to RADARSAT and ENVISAT ScanSAR data. The scheme uses two complementary Doppler estimation algorithms, both utilizing the phase information embedded in the radar signal. In each algorithm, upper and lower parts of the available bandwidth of the received signal are extracted to form two range looks. The first algorithm, called multilook cross correlation (MLCC), computes the average cross correlation coefficient between adjacent azimuth samples for each of the two looks and then takes the difference between the angles of the two coefficients. The Doppler ambiguity is determined from the angle difference. The fractional pulse repetition frequency (PRF) part is also determined from the cross correlation coefficients, in the second algorithm, called multilook beat frequency (MLBF), the two looks are multiplied together to generate a beat signal. The beat frequency is then estimated and the Doppler ambiguity determined from the beat frequency. The MLCC algorithm performs better with low contrast scenes while the MLBF works better with high contrast ones. Although each algorithm works well on its own with sufficient averaging, it is also possible to use quality measures to select the best result from either algorithm. In this way, scenes of different content or contrast can be handled reliably. This paper presents the analysis of the two algorithms, explaining why their performance is affected by scene contrast, which is confirmed by experimental results with ERS-1 and JERS-1 data.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 707
页数:12
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] ScanSAR processing using standard high precision SAR algorithms
    Bamler, R
    Eineder, M
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 34 (01): : 212 - 218
  • [2] PFR-AMBIGUITY RESOLVING BY WAVELENGTH DIVERSITY
    BAMLER, R
    RUNGE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1991, 29 (06): : 997 - 1003
  • [3] CUMMING IG, 1979, IEEE 1979 INT C ACOU
  • [4] CUMMING IG, 1986, P IGARSS ZUR SWITZ S, P1639
  • [5] CUMMING IG, KIN PRESS IEEE T ANT
  • [6] HIRSCH HL, 1991, STAT SIGNAL CHARACTE
  • [7] TIME-DOMAIN ESTIMATION OF THE CENTER FREQUENCY AND SPREAD OF DOPPLER SPECTRA IN DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND
    KRISTOFFERSEN, K
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 1988, 35 (06) : 685 - 700
  • [8] DOPPLER PARAMETER-ESTIMATION FOR SPACEBORNE SYNTHETIC-APERTURE RADARS
    LI, FK
    HELD, DN
    CURLANDER, JC
    WU, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 23 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [9] LUSCOMBE AP, 1988, P IEEE IGARSS 88 S E, P1639
  • [10] ESTIMATING THE DOPPLER CENTROID OF SAR DATA
    MADSEN, SN
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1989, 25 (02) : 134 - 140