Effect of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) on the fire safety of concrete structures

被引:5
作者
Gupta, Sanchit [1 ]
Singh, Dheerendra [1 ]
Gupta, Trilok [2 ]
Chaudhary, Sandeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Indore, Dept Civil Engn, Indore 453552, India
[2] MPUAT, Dept Civil Engn, Coll Technol & Engn, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
exposure duration; exposure temperature; fire risk; fire scenario; LC3; concrete; Monte Carlo simulation; residual strength; three-factor ANOVA; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ELEVATED-TEMPERATURES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DURABILITY; MICROSTRUCTURE; HYDRATION; EXPOSURE; TIME;
D O I
10.12989/cac.2022.29.4.263
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) is a low carbon alternative to conventional cement. Literature shows that using limestone and calcined clay in LC3 increases the thermal degradation of LC3 pastes and can increase the magnitude of fire risk in LC3 concrete structures. Higher thermal degradation of LC3 paste prompts this study toward understanding the fire performance of LC3 concrete and the associated magnitude of fire risk. For fire performance, concrete prepared using ordinary Portland cement (OPC), pozzolanic Portland cement (PPC) and LC3 were exposed to 16 scenarios of different elevated temperatures (400 degrees C, 600 degrees C, 800 degrees C, and 1000 degrees C) for different durations (0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h). After exposure to elevated temperatures, mass loss, residual ultrasonic pulse velocity (rUPV) and residual compressive strength (rCS) were measured as the residual properties of concrete. XRD (X-ray diffraction), TGA (thermogravimetric analysis) and three-factor ANOVA (analysis of variance) are also used to compare the fire performance of LC3 with OPC and PPC. Monte Carlo simulation has been used to assess the magnitude of fire risk in LC3 structures and devise recommendations for the robust application of LC3. Results show that LC3 concrete has weaker fire performance, with average rCS being 11.06% and 1.73% lower than OPC and PPC concrete. Analysis of 106 fire scenarios, in Indian context, shows lower rCS and higher failure probability for LC3 (95.05%, 2.22%) than OPC (98.16%, 0.22%) and PPC (96.48%, 1.14%). For robust application, either LC3 can be restricted to residential and educational structures (failure probability <0.5%), or LC3 can have reserve strength (factor of safety >1.08).
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 278
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 7 SP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EN 1991-1-7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IS 10262: 2019
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, 103311 IS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 1641 IS
[6]   Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone [J].
Antoni, M. ;
Rossen, J. ;
Martirena, F. ;
Scrivener, K. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2012, 42 (12) :1579-1589
[7]   Robustness of self-compacting concrete containing waste foundry sand and metakaolin: A sustainable approach [J].
Ashish, Deepankar Kumar ;
Verma, Surender Kumar .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2021, 401
[8]   Cementing Efficiency of Flash and Rotary-Calcined Metakaolin in Concrete [J].
Ashish, Deepankar Kumar ;
Verma, Surender Kumar .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 31 (12)
[9]   Determination of optimum mixture design method for self-compacting concrete: Validation of method with experimental results [J].
Ashish, Deepankar Kumar ;
Verma, Surender Kumar .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 217 :664-678
[10]   Predicting residual compressive strength of self-compacted concrete under various temperatures and relative humidity conditions by artificial neural networks [J].
Ashteyat, Ahmed M. ;
Ismeik, Muhannad .
COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2018, 21 (01) :47-54