So near and yet so far - Lingering questions about the use of measures of general intelligence for college admission and employment screening

被引:14
作者
Ceci, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Human Dev, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//1076-8971.6.1.233
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The evidentiary bases for the various positions taken by the authors of articles in the March 2000 special theme issue of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, are examined. Despite some substantive disagreements among the authors, a substrate of evidence is accepted (or, at the very least, goes unchallenged) by all authors. Although the substantial progress made by psychometric researchers is acknowledged, there remains a critical need to probe ever more deeply into the nature of intelligence and the meaning of correlations between ability tests and performance at school and at work. The author concludes by arguing that the concept of general intelligence may have considerable predictive usefulness whenever the situation calls for making a limited number of choices among many applicants but that there are lingering conceptual limitations about its meaning.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 252
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NYUL REV
[2]  
Bishop JH, 2000, PSYCHOL PUBLIC POL L, V6, P199
[3]  
Calvin A, 2000, PSYCHOL PUBLIC POL L, V6, P20
[4]  
CECI SJ, 1997, INTELLIGENCE RISE, P287
[5]   A quantitative trait locus associated with cognitive ability in children [J].
Chorney, MJ ;
Chorney, K ;
Seese, N ;
Owen, MJ ;
Daniels, J ;
McGuffin, P ;
Thompson, LA ;
Detterman, DK ;
Benbow, C ;
Lubinski, D ;
Eley, T ;
Plomin, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (03) :159-166
[6]   Testing versus understanding human intelligence [J].
Deary, IJ ;
Austin, EJ ;
Caryl, PG .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :180-190
[7]   Tests, affirmative action in university admissions, and the American way [J].
Detterman, DK .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :44-55
[8]   A principled design framework for college admissions tests - An affirming research agenda [J].
Everson, HT .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :112-120
[9]   A theory of intelligence as processing - Implications for society [J].
Fagan, JF .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :168-179
[10]   The hidden history of IQ and special education - Can the problems be solved? [J].
Flynn, JR .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :191-198