The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts

被引:165
作者
Arnold, Jennifer E.
Griffin, Zenzi M.
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
language production; discourse; reference; pronouns; word selection; proper names; SENTENCE PRODUCTION; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE; SPONTANEOUS SPEECH; SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; 1ST MENTION; DISCOURSE; SPEAKERS; INFORMATION; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Two story-telling experiments examine the process of choosing between pronouns and proper names in speaking. Such choices are traditionally attributed to speakers striving to make referring expressions maximally interpretable to addressees. The experiments revealed a novel effect: even when a pronoun would not be ambiguous, the presence of another character in the discourse decreased pronoun use and increased latencies to refer to the most prominent character in the discourse. In other words, speakers were more likely to call Minnie Minnie than she when Donald was also present. Even when the referent character appeared alone in the stimulus picture, the presence of another character in the preceding discourse reduced pronouns. Furthermore, pronoun use varied with features associated with the speaker's degree of focus on the preceding discourse (e.g., narrative style and disfluency). We attribute this effect to competition for attentional resources in the speaker's representation of the discourse. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 536
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis [J].
Almor, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (04) :748-765
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Statistical principles in experimental design
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, P 25 ANN M ASS COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SPEAKING
[5]  
Ariel M., 1990, ACCESSING NOUN PHRAS
[6]  
Arnold J.E., 1998, DISSERT ABSTR, V59, P2950
[7]   The old and thee, uh, new - Disfluency and reference resolution [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Altmann, RJ ;
Fagnano, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (09) :578-582
[8]   Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Wasow, T ;
Asudeh, A ;
Alrenga, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 51 (01) :55-70
[9]   The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation [J].
Arnold, JE .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2001, 31 (02) :137-162
[10]   Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering [J].
Arnold, JE ;
Wasow, T ;
Losongco, A ;
Ginstrom, R .
LANGUAGE, 2000, 76 (01) :28-55