The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: Evidence for Reliability and Construct Validity in a Sample of Community-Dwelling Italian Adolescents

被引:91
作者
Fossati, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Somma, Antonella [1 ,2 ]
Borroni, Serena [2 ,3 ]
Markon, Kristian E. [4 ]
Krueger, Robert F. [5 ]
机构
[1] LUMSA Univ, Rome, Italy
[2] Osped San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form; adolescence; reliability; validity; DIMENSIONAL MODELS; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; ASSESSING LEVEL; FIT INDEXES; TRAIT MODEL; DISORDER; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1177/1073191115621793
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
To assess the reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) among adolescents, 877 Italian high school students were administered the PID-5-BF. Participants were administered also the Measure of Disordered Personality Functioning (MDPF) as a criterion measure. In the full sample, Cronbach's alpha values for the PID-5-BF scales ranged from .59 (Detachment) to .77 (Psychoticism); in addition, all PID-5-BF scales showed mean interitem correlation values in the .22 to .40 range. Cronbach's alpha values for the PID-5-BF total score was .83 (mean interitem r = .16). Although 2-month test-retest reliability could be assessed only in a small (n = 42) subsample of participants, all PID-5-BF scale scores showed adequate temporal stability, as indexed by intraclass r values ranging from .78 (Negative Affectivity) to .97 (Detachment), all ps < .001. Exploratory structural equation modeling analyses provided at least moderate support for the a priori model of PID-5-BF items. Multiple regression analyses showed that PID-5-BF scales predicted a nonnegligible amount of variance in MDPF Non-Cooperativeness, adjusted R-2 = .17, p < .001, and Non-Coping scales, adjusted R-2 = .32, p < .001. Similarly, the PID-5-BF total score was a significant predictor of both MDPF Non-Coping, and Non-Cooperativeness scales.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 631
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association A. Association A.P, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Adult
[4]   The Nature and Structure of Correlations Among Big Five Ratings: The Halo-Alpha-Beta Model [J].
Anusic, Ivana ;
Schimmack, Ulrich ;
Pinkus, Rebecca T. ;
Lockwood, Penelope .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (06) :1142-1156
[5]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :397-438
[6]   The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample [J].
Bastiaens, Tim ;
Claes, Laurence ;
Smits, Dirk ;
De Clercq, Barbara ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
Rossi, Gina ;
Vanwalleghem, Dominique ;
Vermote, Rudi ;
Lowyck, Benedicte ;
Claes, Stephan ;
De Hert, Marc .
ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (01) :42-51
[7]   Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A Review of Theory and Methods [J].
Bender, Donna S. ;
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (04) :332-346
[8]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling of Personality Data [J].
Booth, Tom ;
Hughes, David J. .
ASSESSMENT, 2014, 21 (03) :260-271
[9]   REMARKS ON PARALLEL ANALYSIS [J].
BUJA, A ;
EYUBOGLU, N .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1992, 27 (04) :509-540
[10]   Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques [J].
Cha, Eun-Seok ;
Kim, Kevin H. ;
Erlen, Judith A. .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2007, 58 (04) :386-395