Droperidol, QT prolongation, and sudden death: What is the evidence?

被引:79
作者
Kao, LW
Kirk, MA
Evers, SJ
Rosenfeld, SH
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Div Med Toxicol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Div Toxicol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mem.2003.110
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Droperidol is a butyrophenone commonly used as an antiemetic and antipsychotic in the United States since US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1970. Its labeling has recently been revised, with a black box warning for cases of QT prolongation leading to torsades de pointes and death. A black box warning is applied when serious adverse drug reactions are uncovered for medications. We sought to examine the evidence of a causal association suggested by the black box warning to aid clinicians in their risk-benefit analyses regarding further use of droperidol. Methods: A literature search was undertaken to determine the evidence regarding the association between droperidol and QT prolongation or torsades de pointes. The evidence was then evaluated by using evidence-based medicine principles. In addition, a review of the FDA regulatory process is presented. Results: Three clinical studies, 1 published abstract, and 7 case reports were reviewed. Available postmarketing surveillance data (MedWatch reports) were also reviewed. Applying the criteria of evidence-based medicine and Hill's criteria, the evidence is not convincing for a causal relationship between therapeutic droperidol administration and life-threatening cardiac events. Conclusion: The recent black box warning appears to have originated from postmarketing surveillance data rather than data reported In the peer-reviewed medical literature. Ongoing monitoring of drug safety and more definitive study appear appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 558
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] AAPRO MS, 1991, ONCOLOGY, V48, P116
  • [2] ADAMANTIDIS MM, 1993, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V266, P884
  • [3] IN-VITRO ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL DETECTION OF IATROGENIC ARRHYTHMOGENICITY
    ADAMANTIDIS, MM
    KERRAM, P
    DUPUIS, BA
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 8 (05) : 391 - 407
  • [4] MIDAZOLAM DROPERIDOL PREMEDICATION FOR CARDIAC-SURGERY - A COMPARISON WITH PAPAVERETUM AND HYOSCINE
    ANTROBUS, JHL
    ABBOTT, P
    CARR, CME
    CHATRATH, RR
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (05) : 407 - 409
  • [5] The FDA droperidol warning: Is it justified?
    Bailey, P
    Norton, R
    Karan, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) : 288 - 289
  • [6] Baldessarini RJ, 2001, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P485, DOI DOI 10.1002/hup.540
  • [7] Droperidol "box warning" warrants scrutiny
    Ben-David, B
    Weber, S
    Chernus, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) : 288 - 288
  • [8] Comparison of fentanyl and droperidol mixture (neuroleptanalgesia II) with morphine on clinical outcomes in unstable angina patients
    Burduk, P
    Guzik, P
    Piechocka, M
    Bronisz, M
    Rozek, A
    Jazdon, M
    Jordan, MR
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2000, 14 (03) : 259 - 269
  • [9] Droperidol: Efficacy and side effects in psychiatric emergencies
    Chambers, RA
    Druss, BG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (10) : 664 - 667
  • [10] De Ponti F, 2002, DRUG SAFETY, V25, P263