Classification and evaluation of anastomotic leaks after esophageal surgery-a tertiary university experience

被引:3
作者
El-Sourani, Nader [1 ]
Kechagia, Chousein [1 ]
Alfarawan, Fadl [1 ]
Troja, Achim [1 ]
Bockhorn, Maximilian [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Oldenburg AaR, Univ Hosp, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Rahel Strauss Str 10, D-26133 Oldenburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA | 2022年 / 54卷 / 02期
关键词
Stenting; Endoluminal therapy; CAES; Esophagus; Endoscopy;
D O I
10.1007/s10353-021-00706-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus is the most feared complication of surgeons, leading to high postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, there is no internationally accepted guideline for its classification and treatment algorithm. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the detection of anastomotic leaks as well as to discuss and validate the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound in late 2018. Methods All patients undergoing surgery for malignancy of the esophagogastric junction between 2013 and 2020 were analyzed. Out of these patients, those diagnosed with an anastomotic insufficiency were extracted and classified according to the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound. Continuous variables were expressed as medians, categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test or chi-square test. Results From 2013 to 2020, all 23 patients (10.84%) who developed an anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery were included in this study. The study revealed a significant increase in median hospital stay, median intensive care unit stay, and overall mortality rate (p = 0.028) with increased classification type. Conclusion The results of this study showed that the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound can be validated and that there is a clear differentiation between the subtypes. Standardized diagnosis and management improve the overall outcome of patients. Main novel aspects This article gives an introduction to classifying anastomotic insufficiencies according to the classification proposed by the Surgical Working Group on Endoscopy and Ultrasound. Results of the classification can be validated, with a clear differentiation of postoperative outcome between subtypes.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 85
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study
    Ahrens, M.
    Schulte, T.
    Egberts, J.
    Schafmayer, C.
    Hampe, J.
    Fritscher-Ravens, A.
    Broering, D. C.
    Schniewind, B.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (09) : 693 - 698
  • [2] Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery
    Bruce, J
    Krukowski, ZH
    Al-Khairy, G
    Russell, EM
    Park, KGM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) : 1157 - 1168
  • [3] El-Sourani N, 2017, POL J RADIOL, V82, P170, DOI 10.12659/PJR.899951
  • [4] Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    Harnsberger, Cristina R.
    Broderick, Ryan C.
    Chang, David C.
    Sandler, Bryan J.
    Jacobsen, Garth R.
    Bouvet, Michael
    Horgan, Santiago
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (06): : 2491 - 2497
  • [5] Glatz T, 2015, CHIRURG, V86, P662, DOI 10.1007/s00104-014-2877-9
  • [6] Long-term quality of life after endovac-therapy in anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy
    Heits, Nils
    Bernsmeier, Alexander
    Reichert, Benedikt
    Hauser, Charlotte
    Hendricks, Alexander
    Seifert, Dana
    Richter, Florian
    Schafmayer, Clemens
    Ellrichmann, Mark
    Schniewind, Bodo
    Hampe, Jochen
    Becker, Thomas
    Egberts, Jan-Hendrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (01) : 228 - 240
  • [7] The prevention and management of perioperative complications
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Vallboehmer, Daniel
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 20 (05) : 907 - 923
  • [8] Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy
    Karl, RC
    Schreiber, R
    Boulware, D
    Baker, S
    Coppola, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) : 635 - 641
  • [9] Lerut T, 2001, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V10, P863
  • [10] International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
    Low, Donald E.
    Alderson, Derek
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Law, Simon Ying Kit
    Lerut, Toni E.
    Maynard, Nick
    Pera, Manuel
    Peters, Jeffrey H.
    Pramesh, C. S.
    Reynolds, John V.
    Smithers, B. Mark
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 286 - 294