Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex

被引:125
作者
Samani, Mohsen Mosayebi [1 ,2 ]
Agboada, Desmond [1 ,3 ]
Jamil, Asif [1 ]
Kuo, Min-Fang [1 ]
Nitsche, Michael A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Res Ctr Working Environm & Human Factors, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Ardeystr 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany
[2] Ilmenau Univ Technol, Inst Biomed Engn & Informat, Ilmenau, Germany
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Int Grad Sch Neurosci, Bochum, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Bergmannsheil, Dept Neurol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
tDCS; TMS; MEP; Plasticity; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; EXCITABILITY; LTP; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; POLARIZATION; INHIBITION; INTENSITY; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) non-invasively induces polarity-dependent excitability alterations in the human motor cortex lasting for more than an hour after stimulation. Clinical applications with encouraging results have been reported in several pilot studies, but the optimal stimulation protocols remain to be determined. This is also important because the efficacy and directionality of tDCS effects follow non-linear rules regarding neuroplastic effects for the stimulation parameters duration and intensity. In this study, we systemically explored the association between tDCS, these parameters and induced after-effects on motor cortex excitability. Cathodal tDCS was applied in four different intensities (sham, 1, 2 and 3 mA) and three durations (15, 20 and 30 mins) in 16 young healthy subjects and the after-effects were monitored with TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEP) until the next day evening after stimulation. The results of the repeated measures ANOVA conducted to disentangle the effects of tDCS intensity and duration show a main effect of intensity in which 1 mA and 3 mA stimulation induced a reduction of MEP amplitudes, but 2 mA resulted in excitability enhancement. The results of a secondary ANOVA conducted to compare if active stimulation effects differ from those of sham stimulation revealed a significant main effect of tDCS condition in which 1 mA-15 min, 1 mA-30 min and 3 mA-20 min cathodal tDCS induced LTD-like plasticity, while LTP-like plasticity was observed after 2 mA-20 min stimulation. Our study thus provides further insights on the dependency of tDCS -induced neuroplasticity from the stimulation parameters, and therefore delivers crucial information for future applications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 361
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability by Different Current Densities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Bastani, Andisheh ;
Jaberzadeh, Shapour .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08)
[2]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[3]   Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 [J].
Bikson, Marom ;
Grossman, Pnina ;
Thomas, Chris ;
Zannou, Adantchede Louis ;
Jiang, Jimmy ;
Adnan, Tatheer ;
Mourdoukoutas, Antonios P. ;
Kronberg, Greg ;
Truong, Dennis ;
Boggio, Paulo ;
Brunoni, Andre R. ;
Charvet, Leigh ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Fritsch, Brita ;
Gillick, Bernadette ;
Hamilton, Roy H. ;
Hampstead, Benjamin M. ;
Jankord, Ryan ;
Kirton, Adam ;
Knotkova, Helena ;
Liebetanz, David ;
Liu, Anli ;
Loo, Colleen ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Reis, Janine ;
Richardson, Jessica D. ;
Rotenberg, Alexander ;
Turkeltaub, Peter E. ;
Woods, Adam J. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) :641-661
[4]   A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression [J].
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;
Ribeiro, Rafael B. ;
Myczkowski, Martin L. ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Fregni, Felipe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 11 (02) :249-254
[5]   Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study [J].
Chhatbar, Pratik Y. ;
Chen, Rong ;
Deardorff, Rachael ;
Dellenbach, Blair ;
Kautz, Steven A. ;
George, Mark S. ;
Feng, Wuwei .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (03) :553-559
[6]   The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical inhibition in healthy human subjects [J].
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. ;
Moeller, Bertram ;
Christensen, Bruce K. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Gunraj, Carolyn ;
Chen, Robert .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (03) :403-412
[7]   Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Baker, Julie M. ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Fridriksson, Julius .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (03) :169-174
[8]   Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bansal, Varun ;
Diaz, Julian ;
Patel, Jinal ;
Reato, Davide ;
Bikson, Marom .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) :201-207
[9]   Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back [J].
Dayan, Eran ;
Censor, Nitzan ;
Buch, Ethan R. ;
Sandrini, Marco ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 16 (07) :838-844
[10]   Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke [J].
Edwards, D. J. ;
Krebs, H. I. ;
Rykman, A. ;
Zipse, J. ;
Thickbroom, G. W. ;
Mastaglia, F. L. ;
Pascual-Leone, A. ;
Volpe, B. T. .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 27 (03) :199-207