Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis

被引:89
|
作者
Graham, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xinghua [3 ]
Aitken, Angelique [4 ]
Ng, Clarence [1 ]
Bartlett, Brendan [5 ]
Harris, Karen R. [4 ]
Holzapfel, Jennifer [4 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic Univ, Learning Sci Inst Australia, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Arizona State Univ, Div Leadership & Innovat, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers Coll, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Arizona State Univ, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers Coll, Tempe, AZ USA
[5] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Educ & Arts, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Comprehension; Content literacy; Decoding; Family literacy; Home-school connections; Parental involvement; Phonics; phonemic awareness; phonological awareness; Policy; Research methodology; Evidence-based; Strategies; methods; and materials; Instructional models; Writing strategies; Theoretical perspectives; Cognitive; Sociocultural; Writing; Early childhood; Childhood; Early adolescence; Adolescence; ENGLISH-LANGUAGE LEARNERS; COGNITIVE STRATEGIES APPROACH; LEARNING APPROACH; EFFECT SIZES; GRADES; 4-6; STUDENTS; INTERVENTIONS; ACHIEVEMENT; CHILDREN; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.194
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Reading and writing are critical to students' success in and outside of school. Because they draw on common sources of knowledge and cognitive processes, involve meaning making, and can be used conjointly to accomplish important learning goals, it is often recommended that reading and writing should be taught together. This meta-analysis tested this proposition by examining experimental intervention studies with preschool through high school students to determine whether literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction strengthen students' reading and writing performance. To be included in this review, no more than 60% of instruction could be devoted to either reading or writing. As predicted, these programs improved students' reading, resulting in statistically significant effects when reading measures were averaged in each study (effect size [ES] = .39) or assessed through measures of reading comprehension (ES = .39), decoding (ES = .53), or reading vocabulary (ES = .35). The programs also statistically enhanced writing when measures were averaged in each study (ES = .37) or assessed via writing quality (ES = .47), writing mechanics (ES = .18), or writing output (ES = .69). These findings demonstrated that literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction can strengthen reading and writing and that the two skills can be learned together profitably.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 304
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Writing to Read: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Writing and Writing Instruction on Reading
    Graham, Steve
    Hebert, Michael
    HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2011, 81 (04) : 710 - 744
  • [2] Effective literacy instruction: Building successful reading and writing programs
    Langer, JA
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2003, 46 (08) : 705 - 707
  • [3] Effects of writing instruction on the reading outcomes of students with literacy difficulties in pre-kindergarten to fifth grade: a meta-analysis
    Shanahan, Emma
    Reno, Emily
    Chandler, Brennan W.
    Novelli, Christina
    An, Jechun
    Choi, Seohyeon
    Mcmaster, Kristen L.
    READING AND WRITING, 2025, 38 (03) : 627 - 650
  • [4] Reading for Writing: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions on Writing
    Graham, Steve
    Liu, Xinghua
    Bartlett, Brendan
    Ng, Clarence
    Harris, Karen R.
    Aitken, Angelique
    Barkel, Ashley
    Kavanaugh, Colin
    Talukdar, Joy
    REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 88 (02) : 243 - 284
  • [5] On the Effectiveness of Family Programs of Preschool Education in the Field of Literacy - Results of a meta-analysis
    McElvany, Nele
    Herppich, Stephanie
    van Steensel, Roel
    Kurvers, Jeanne
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 2010, 56 (02): : 178 - 192
  • [6] A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
    Graham, Steve
    Perin, Dolores
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 99 (03) : 445 - 476
  • [7] A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences
    Antes, Alison L.
    Murphy, Stephen T.
    Waples, Ethan P.
    Mumford, Michael D.
    Brown, Ryan P.
    Connelly, Shane
    Devenport, Lynn D.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (05) : 379 - 402
  • [8] A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades
    Graham, Steve
    McKeown, Debra
    Kiuhara, Sharlene
    Harris, Karen R.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 104 (04) : 879 - 896
  • [9] Meta-analysis of professional development programs in differentiated instruction
    Kahmann, Rebecca
    Droop, Mienke
    Lazonder, Ard W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 116
  • [10] The Effectiveness of Automated Writing Evaluation on Writing Quality: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhai, Na
    Ma, Xiaomei
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (04) : 875 - 900