SIMILAR BUT NOT THE SAME: DIFFERENTIATING CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY FROM CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

被引:450
作者
Bansal, Pratima [1 ]
Song, Hee-Chan [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, London, ON, Canada
关键词
RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL-ISSUES; GENERAL SYSTEMS-THEORY; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; RISK-MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2015.0095
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate responsibility and sustainability tackle the relationship between business and society. However, the two fields of study have converged to become deeply entangled and blurred so that researchers from both research traditions now speak to the same business risks and opportunities. A field's development is shaped by the clarity of its constructs and underlying assumptions; however, such clarity has eroded in responsibility and sustainability research. By tracing the development of these fields, we show that responsibility and sustainability were historically distinctive. Responsibility research took a normative position, railing against the amorality of business; sustainability research took a systems perspective, sounding the alarm of business- driven failures in natural systems. The convergence in responsibility and sustainability has not only confused constructs but has also vacated vast tracts of unexplored territory that can inform the relationship between business and society. By sharpening the distinctiveness between responsibility and sustainability, we call for further research to deepen the areas of research unique to each of these two fields of study and explore their complementarities and intersections.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 149
页数:45
相关论文
共 337 条
[1]   Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen's Legacy: The Unachieved Agenda and Continuing Relevance of Social Responsibilities of the Businessman [J].
Acquier, Aurelien ;
Gond, Jean-Pascal ;
Pasquero, Jean .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2011, 50 (04) :607-646
[2]   An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence [J].
Adams, M ;
Hardwick, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 35 (05) :641-654
[3]   SHAREHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS: HOW DO DIRECTORS DECIDE? [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Licht, Amir N. ;
Sagiv, Lilach .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (12) :1331-1355
[4]   Critical Management Studies [J].
Adler, Paul S. ;
Forbes, Linda C. ;
Willmott, Hugh .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2007, 1 :119-179
[5]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[6]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[7]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[8]   Does Environmental Management Improve Financial Performance? A Meta-Analytical Review [J].
Albertini, Elisabeth .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :431-457
[9]   Complex systems - A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems [J].
Amaral, Luis A. Nunes ;
Uzzi, Brian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (07) :1033-1035
[10]   Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations [J].
Andersson, LM ;
Bateman, TS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :548-570