The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion- guided biopsy

被引:3
作者
Maruf, M. [1 ]
Fascelli, M. [1 ]
George, A. K. [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. M. [2 ]
Kongnyuy, M. [1 ]
DiBianco, J. M. [1 ]
Muthigi, A. [1 ]
Valayil, S. [1 ]
Sidana, A. [1 ]
Frye, T. P. [1 ]
Kilchevsky, A. [1 ]
Choyke, P. L. [3 ]
Turkbey, B. [3 ]
Wood, B. J. [4 ,5 ]
Pinto, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Ctr Canc Res, NIH, Urol Oncol Branch, Bldg 10 Hatfield CRC,Room 1-5940, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NIH, NIH Clin Ctr, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
RESONANCE-ULTRASOUND FUSION; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; ERSPC;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.46
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 (PCPTRC) is a widely used risk-based calculator used to assess a man's risk of prostate cancer (PCa) before biopsy. This risk calculator was created from data of a patient cohort undergoing a 6-core sextant biopsy, and subsequently validated in men undergoing 12-core systematic biopsy (SBx). The accuracy of the PCPTRC has not been studied in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion-guided biopsy (FBx). We sought to assess the performance of the PCPTRC for straitifying PCa risk in a FBx cohort. METHODS: A review of a prospective cohort undergoing MRI and FBx/SBx was conducted. Data from consecutive FBx/SBx were collected between August 2007 and February 2014, and PCPTRC scores using the PCPTRC2.0R-code were calculated. The risk of positive biopsy and high-grade cancer (Gleason >= 7) on biopsy was calculated and compared with overall and high-grade cancer detection rates (CDRs).Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared using DeLong's test. RESULTS: Of 595 men included in the study, PCa was detected in 39% (232) by SBx compared with 48% (287) on combined FBx/SBx biopsy. The PCPTRC AUCs for the CDR were similar (P = 0.70) for SBx (0.69) and combined biopsy (0.70). For high-grade disease, AUCs for SBx (0.71) and combined biopsy (0.70) were slightly higher, but were not statistically different (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: In an MRI-screened population of men undergoing FBx, PCPTRC continues to represent a practical method of accurately stratifying PCa risk.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 185
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 for the Prediction of Low- vs High-grade Prostate Cancer [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Hoefler, Josef ;
Bock, Sebastian ;
Goodman, Phyllis J. ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Sokoll, Lori J. ;
Sanda, Martin G. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Leach, Robin J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) :1362-1367
[2]   Evaluating the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial High Grade prostate cancer risk calculator in 10 international biopsy cohorts: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Boeck, Andreas ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Jones, J. Stephen ;
Cronin, Angel M. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Hamdy, Freddie ;
Neal, David ;
Donovan, Jenny ;
Parekh, Dipen J. ;
Klocker, Helmut ;
Horninger, Wolfgang ;
Benchikh, Amine ;
Salama, Gilles ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
Moreira, Daniel M. ;
Schroder, Fritz H. ;
Lilja, Hans ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) :185-191
[3]   The Impact of Prostate Volume, Number of Biopsy Cores and American Urological Association Symptom Score on the Sensitivity of Cancer Detection Using the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator [J].
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Till, Cathee ;
Boeck, Andreas ;
Goodman, Phyllis ;
Tangen, Catherine M. ;
Feng, Ziding ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Chan, Daniel W. ;
Sokoll, Lori ;
Kagan, Jacob ;
Wei, John T. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (01) :70-76
[4]   Prostate-specificy-antigen testing for early diagnosis of prostate cancer. [J].
Barry, MJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (18) :1373-1377
[5]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[6]   Multiparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer [J].
Esen, Tarik ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Patel, Anup ;
Futterer, Jurgen .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[7]   Validation in a Multiple Urology Practice Cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Calculator for Predicting Prostate Cancer Detection [J].
Eyre, Stephen J. ;
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Wei, John T. ;
Nair, Prakash V. ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Bueti, Gerrardina ;
Tang, Jeffrey ;
Rubin, Mark A. ;
Kearney, Michael ;
Thompson, Ian M. ;
Sanda, Martin G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) :2653-2658
[8]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[9]   European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study [J].
Foley, Robert W. ;
Maweni, Robert M. ;
Gorman, Laura ;
Murphy, Keefe ;
Lundon, Dara J. ;
Durkan, Garrett ;
Power, Richard ;
O'Brien, Frank ;
O'Malley, Kieran J. ;
Galvin, David J. ;
Murphy, T. Brendan ;
Watson, R. William .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (05) :706-713
[10]   Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer [J].
Loeb, Stacy ;
Bjurlin, Marc A. ;
Nicholson, Joseph ;
Tammela, Teuvo L. ;
Penson, David F. ;
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Carroll, Peter ;
Etzioni, Ruth .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) :1046-1055