Shared Cognitive-Emotional-Interactional Platforms: Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations

被引：101
作者：
Mansilla, Veronica Boix [1 ]
Lamont, Michele [2 ]
Sato, Kyoko [3 ]
机构：
[1] Harvard Grad Sch Educ, Future Learning Inst, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Sociol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Program Sci Technol & Soc, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源：
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES | 2016年 / 41卷 / 04期
关键词：
interdisciplinarity; interdisciplinary research; collaboration; disciplines; disciplinary culture; interdisciplinary cognition; knowledge production; emotion and cognition; boundary work; research evaluation; BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; SOCIOLOGY; WORK;
D O I：
10.1177/0162243915614103
中图分类号：
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Given the growing centrality of interdisciplinarity to scientific research, gaining a better understanding of successful interdisciplinary collaborations has become imperative. Drawing on extensive case studies of nine research networks in the social, natural, and computational sciences, we propose a construct that captures the multidimensional character of such collaborations, that of a shared cognitive-emotional-interactional (SCEI) platform. We demonstrate its value as an integrative lens to examine markers of and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations as defined by researchers involved in these groups. We show that (1) markers and conditions embody three different dimensions: cognitive, emotional, and interactional; (2) these dimensions are present in all networks, albeit to different degrees; (3) the dimensions are intertwined and mutually constitutive; and (4) they operate in conjunction with institutional conditions created by funders. We compare the SCEI platforms to available frameworks for successful interdisciplinary work.
引用
收藏
页码：571 / 612
页数：42
相关论文
共 103 条
[11]  
Bromme R., 2000, PRACTICING INTERDISC, P115
[12]   Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme [J].
Bruce, A ;
Lyall, C ;
Tait, J ;
Williams, R .
FUTURES, 2004, 36 (04) :457-470
[13]  
Bruun H., 2005, Promoting interdisciplinary Research
[14]  
Camic Charles., 2011, SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE MAK
[15]  
Clark H. H., 1992, Arenas of language use
[16]  
Collins H.M., 2007, Rethinking Expertise, DOI 10.7208/9780226113623
[17]  
Collins H.M., 2010, TRADING ZONES INTERA, P7, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/9780262014724.003.0002
[18]  
Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, DOI DOI 10.1080/00222216.1992.11969876
[19]  
Derry S.J., 2005, Interdisciplinary Collabora- tion: An Emerging Cognitive Science
[20]  
Dominic Holland, 2014, INTEGRATING KNOWLEDG
12345678910