How does inattention affect written and spoken language processing?

被引:13
|
作者
Cohen, Laurent [1 ,2 ]
Salondy, Philippine [1 ]
Pallier, Christophe [3 ]
Dehaene, Stanislas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UPMC Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Univ, Inst Cerveau, ICM,Inserm U 1127,CNRS,UMR 7225,UMR S1127, F-75013 Paris, France
[2] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Federat Neurol, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris Sud, Univ Paris Saclay, NeuroSpin Ctr, Cognit Neuroimaging Unit,CEA DRF I2BM,INSERM, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[4] Coll France, Paris, France
关键词
Reading; Language; Attention; fmri; CORTICAL REPRESENTATION; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SEMANTIC SYSTEM; FMRI; SPEECH; BRAIN; SYNTAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The classic cocktail party effect suggests that some, but probably not all levels of language processing can proceed without attention. We used whole-brain functional MRI to investigate how modality-specific and modality-independent language areas are modulated by the withdrawal of attention to another sensory modality (e.g., attending to vision during the presentation of auditory sentences, or vice-versa). We tested the hypotheses that inattention may abolish sentence-level integration and eliminate top-down effects. In both written and spoken modalities, language processing was strongly modulated by the distraction of attention, but this inattention effect varied considerably depending on the area and hierarchical level of language processing. Under inattention, a bottom-up activation remained in early modality-specific areas, particularly in superior temporal spoken language areas, but the difference between sentences and words lists vanished. Under both attended and unattended conditions, ventral temporal cortices were activated in a top down manner by spoken language more than by control stimuli, reaching posteriorily the Visual Word Form Area. We conclude that inattention prevents sentence-level syntactic and semantic integration, but preserves some top-down crossmodal processing, plus a large degree of bottom-up modality-specific processing, including a ventral occipitotemporal specialization for letter strings in a known alphabet. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 227
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neural stages of spoken, written, and signed word processing in beginning second language learners
    Leonard, Matthew K.
    Ramirez, Naja Ferjan
    Torres, Christina
    Hatrak, Marla
    Mayberry, Rachel I.
    Halgren, Eric
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [2] Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension
    Davis, MH
    Johnsrude, IS
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 23 (08) : 3423 - 3431
  • [3] Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: An Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis
    Rodd, Jennifer M.
    Vitello, Sylvia
    Woollams, Anna M.
    Adank, Patti
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2015, 141 : 89 - 102
  • [4] How reading acquisition changes children's spoken language network
    Monzalvo, Karla
    Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 127 (03) : 356 - 365
  • [5] Convergence of spoken and written language processing in the superior temporal sulcus
    Wilson, Stephen M.
    Bautista, Alexa
    McCarron, Angelica
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 171 : 62 - 74
  • [6] How accentuation influences the processing of emotional words in spoken language: An ERP study
    Sun, Yifan
    Sommer, Werner
    Li, Weijun
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2022, 166
  • [7] How to study spoken language understanding: a survey of neuroscientific methods
    Rodd, Jennifer M.
    Davis, Matthew H.
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 32 (07) : 805 - 817
  • [8] Neural representational similarity betweenL1andL2in spoken and written language processing
    Kim, Say Young
    Liu, Lanfang
    Liu, Li
    Cao, Fan
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2020, 41 (17) : 4935 - 4951
  • [9] Does brief exposure to a written text affect spelling performance in a second language?
    Degani, Tamar
    Bar-David, Orr Yagve
    Adam, Lior Levy
    READING AND WRITING, 2023, 36 (07) : 1901 - 1935
  • [10] Functional connectivity explains how neuronavigated TMS of posterior temporal subregions differentially affect language processing
    Vasileiadi, Maria
    Schuler, Anna-Lisa
    Woletz, Michael
    Linhardt, David
    Windischberger, Christian
    Tik, Martin
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2023, 16 (04) : 1062 - 1071