Cetuximab and First-Line Taxane/Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial BMS099

被引:327
|
作者
Lynch, Thomas J. [1 ]
Patel, Taral
Dreisbach, Luke
McCleod, Michael
Heim, William J.
Hermann, Robert C.
Paschold, Eugene
Iannotti, Nicholas O.
Dakhil, Shaker
Gorton, Steven
Pautret, Virginie
Weber, Martin R.
Woytowitz, Donald
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; VINORELBINE PLUS CISPLATIN; OPEN-LABEL; GEMCITABINE; CARBOPLATIN; PACLITAXEL; GEFITINIB; COMBINATION; MUTATIONS; ERLOTINIB;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9618
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus taxane/carboplatin (TC) as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods This multicenter, open-label, phase III study enrolled 676 chemotherapy-nave patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, without restrictions by histology or epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Patients were randomly assigned to cetuximab/TC or TC. TC consisted of paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)), at the investigator's discretion, and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) on day 1 every 3 weeks for <= six cycles; cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) on day 1, 250 mg/m(2) weekly) was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by independent radiologic review committee (PFS-IRRC); overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and safety were key secondary end points. PFS and ORR assessed by investigators were also evaluated. Results Median PFS-IRRC was 4.40 months with cetuximab/TC versus 4.24 months with TC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.902; 95% CI, 0.761 to 1.069; P = .236). Median OS was 9.69 months with cetuximab/ TC versus 8.38 months with TC (HR = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.754 to 1.051; P = .169). ORR-IRRC was 25.7% with cetuximab/ TC versus 17.2% with TC (P = .007). The safety profile of this combination was manageable and consistent with its individual components. Conclusion The addition of cetuximab to TC did not significantly improve the primary end point, PFS-IRRC. There was significant improvement in ORR by IRRC. The difference in OS favored cetuximab but did not reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 917
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oxaliplatin in First-line Therapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Raez, Luis E.
    Kobina, Svetlana
    Santos, Edgardo S.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2010, 11 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [32] Docetaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy combined with cetuximab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-Results of the nonrandomised phase II study TaxErb
    Fischer, J. R.
    Griesinger, F.
    Fink, T.
    Salm, T.
    Marseille, A.
    Wolf, M.
    LUNG CANCER, 2012, 75 (03) : 348 - 352
  • [33] Randomized International Phase III Trial of ERCC1 and RRM1 Expression-Based Chemotherapy Versus Gemcitabine/Carboplatin in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Bepler, Gerold
    Williams, Charles
    Schell, Michael J.
    Chen, Wei
    Zheng, Zhong
    Simon, George
    Gadgeel, Shirish
    Zhao, Xiuhua
    Schreiber, Fred
    Brahmer, Julie
    Chiappori, Alberto
    Tanvetyanon, Tawee
    Pinder-Schenck, Mary
    Gray, Jhanelle
    Haura, Eric
    Antonia, Scott
    Fischer, Juergen R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (19) : 2404 - +
  • [34] Carboplatin and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study
    Ramalingam, S
    Dobbs, TW
    Einzig, AI
    Wojtowicz-Praga, S
    Cascino, M
    Bonomi, P
    Belani, CP
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 53 (05) : 439 - 444
  • [35] A Phase II Study of First-Line Chemotherapy with Weekly Carboplatin Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Mori, Kiyoshi
    Kamiyama, Yukari
    Kasai, Hisashi
    Kodama, Tetsuro
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 58 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [36] Carboplatin and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study
    Sakkaraiappan Ramalingam
    Tracy W. Dobbs
    Avi I. Einzig
    Slawomir Wojtowicz-Praga
    Marianne Cascino
    Phillip Bonomi
    Chandra P. Belani
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2004, 53 : 439 - 444
  • [37] Randomised phase II study of axitinib or bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel/carboplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Twelves, C.
    Chmielowska, E.
    Havel, L.
    Popat, S.
    Swieboda-Sadlej, A.
    Sawrycki, P.
    Bycott, P.
    Ingrosso, A.
    Kim, S.
    Williams, J. A.
    Chen, C.
    Olszanski, A. J.
    de Besi, P.
    Schiller, J. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [38] EGFR inhibitors as the first-line systemic treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Kao, Hsiang-Fong
    Lin, Chia-Chi
    Yang, James Chih-Hsin
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (07) : 991 - 1003
  • [39] Randomized open-label non-comparative multicenter phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy: GFPC 10.02 study
    Auliac, J. B.
    Chouaid, C.
    Greiller, L.
    Monnet, I.
    Le Caer, H.
    Falchero, L.
    Corre, R.
    Descourt, R.
    Bota, S.
    Berard, H.
    Schott, R.
    Bizieux, A.
    Fournel, P.
    Labrunie, A.
    Marin, B.
    Vergnenegre, A.
    LUNG CANCER, 2014, 85 (03) : 415 - 419
  • [40] A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin with or without Cediranib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0528
    Dy, Grace K.
    Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
    Nelson, Garth D.
    Meyers, Jeffrey P.
    Adjei, Araba A.
    Ross, Helen J.
    Ansari, Rafat H.
    Lyss, Alan P.
    Stella, Philip J.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Molina, Julian R.
    Adjei, Alex A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 (01) : 79 - 88