Experimental and Numerical Studies on Development of Fracture Process Zone (FPZ) in Rocks under Cyclic and Static Loadings

被引:129
作者
Ghamgosar, M. [1 ]
Erarslan, N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Civil Engn, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Adana Sci & Technol Univ, Min & Mineral Proc Engn, Adana, Turkey
关键词
FPZ; Subcritical crack propagation; Rock fracture toughness; CCNBD; CT scan; SEM; TIME-DEPENDENT FAILURE; BRITTLE MATERIALS; CRACK-GROWTH; PROPAGATION; COMPRESSION; TOUGHNESS; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-015-0793-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The development of fracture process zones (FPZ) in the Cracked Chevron Notched Brazilian Disc (CCNBD) monsonite and Brisbane tuff specimens was investigated to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of brittle rocks under static and various cyclic loadings. An FPZ is a region that involves different types of damage around the pre-existing and/or stress-induced crack tips in engineering materials. This highly damaged area includes micro- and meso-cracks, which emerge prior to the main fracture growth or extension and ultimately coalescence to macrofractures, leading to the failure. The experiments and numerical simulations were designed for this study to investigate the following features of FPZ in rocks: (1) ligament connections and (2) microcracking and its coalescence in FPZ. A Computed Tomography (CT) scan technique was also used to investigate the FPZ behaviour in selected rock specimens. The CT scan results showed that the fracturing velocity is entirely dependent on the appropriate amount of fracture energy absorbed in rock specimens due to the change of frequency and amplitudes of the dynamic loading. Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) was used to compute the displacements, tensile stress distribution and plastic energy dissipation around the propagating crack tip in FPZ. One of the most important observations, the shape of FPZ and its extension around the crack tip, was made using numerical and experimental results, which supported the CT scan results. When the static rupture and the cyclic rupture were compared, the main differences are twofold: (1) the number of fragments produced is much greater under cyclic loading than under static loading, and (2) intergranular cracks are formed due to particle breakage under cyclic loading compared with smooth and bright cracks along cleavage planes under static loading.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 908
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1920, The phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, C ROCK FRACTURE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FRACTURE MECH FUNDAM
[4]   FRACTURE-MECHANICS PARAMETERS OF SOME ROCK-FORMING MINERALS DETERMINED USING AN INDENTATION TECHNIQUE [J].
ATKINSON, BK ;
AVDIS, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1980, 17 (06) :383-386
[5]   SUBCRITICAL CRACK-GROWTH IN GEOLOGICAL-MATERIALS [J].
ATKINSON, BK .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 89 (NB6) :4077-4114
[6]   TIME-DEPENDENT FAILURE OF ROCK UNDER CYCLIC LOADING [J].
COSTIN, LS ;
HOLCOMB, DJ .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1981, 79 (3-4) :279-296
[7]   Identifying crack initiation and propagation thresholds in brittle rock [J].
Eberhardt, E ;
Stead, D ;
Stimpson, B ;
Read, RS .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 35 (02) :222-233
[8]   Mechanism of rock fatigue damage in terms of fracturing modes [J].
Erarslan, N. ;
Williams, D. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2012, 43 :76-89
[10]  
EVANS AG, 1974, METALL TRANS, V5, P27