Directional coronary atherectomy vs. rotational atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries

Management of in-stent restenosis has become a significant challenge in interventional cardiology. Since the mechanism of in-stent restenosis is predominantly intimal hyperplasia, debulking techniques have been used to treat, this condition. This study is a nonrandomized comparison of the immediate and long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA; n=58) vs. high-speed rotational atherectomy (ROTA; n=61) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in either group. DCA resulted in a larger postprocedural minimal luminal diameter of (2.57+/-0.51 vs. 2.14+/-0.37 mm; P<0.0001) and a larger acute gain (1.83 +/- 0.52 vs. 1.42 +/- 0.48 mm; P<0.0001). Furthermore, 12-month clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (39% vs. 21%; P=0.02) and long-term follow-up MACE (44% vs. 28%; P=0.03) was greater in the ROTA group. The present study suggests that DCA appears to be superior to ROTA for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of native coronary arteries. Compared to ROTA, the debulking effect of DCA leads to a larger postprocedure minimal luminal diameter, and a lower incidence of subsequent target lesion revascularization and MACE.